|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Wednesday March 14 00:13:00 2012 Re: fearnet-Todd and Book of pure evil |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > I've seen this there arent really any good closeups. You > could get some good hd caps though. But i don't know if > it's on blu ray yet. I know season 1 was. Just downloaded the ep in HD (a great quality cap). It definitely has the scene as described. Time for me to work my magic....... |
| Sam |
| Wednesday March 14 05:08:33 2012 Re: Küstenwache |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Very nice Well, no... not really. IMO, just like "gag snobs," I think there's a "hands tied in front" issue also. (This is a topic I don't recall reading here at all, or at least lately). If someones' hands are bound in front, she's *not helpless* - not in the least. She ccould easily remove a gag, give the captor a (2 handed) chop to the head, give someone a bear hug, etc., etc... (unless there is additional rope rigging, like arms tied to body). If hands are not tied behind the back, I'd rather see no bondage at all, (well almost anyway). Anyone have any thoughts on this? |
| old man |
| Wednesday March 14 06:04:22 2012 La mujer de judas (2012) |
| Not so long ago there was a scene in La caso de al lado, many put it as one of the best scenes of year. I think a scene with Anette Michel surpassed it! Are available two gagged(tape and cleave), sexual positions of a bondage(tied to a chair and arms tied over her head), a lot of emotions, struggling, she cries and squirm! And certainly the woman is excellent! Already now scene great! And can be still and continuation... |
| Alexander |
| Wednesday March 14 12:16:24 2012 Re: Küstenwache |
| old man wrote: > (unsigned poster) wrote: > > Very nice > Well, no... not really. > IMO, just like "gag snobs," I think there's a > "hands tied in front" issue also. (This is a > topic I don't recall reading here at all, or at least > lately). If someones' hands are bound in front, she's > *not helpless* - not in the least. She ccould easily > remove a gag, give the captor a (2 handed) chop to the > head, give someone a bear hug, etc., etc... (unless there > is additional rope rigging, like arms tied to body). If > hands are not tied behind the back, I'd rather see no > bondage at all, (well almost anyway). > Anyone have any thoughts on this? Thoughts? Only the usual, that movie (and TV) makers fall into inexplicable cliches all the time, some of which become enshrined in the public psyche. "Hands tied in front = helpless" is only one example. Others include: Cars blow up real good. If you shoot a handgun at a car being driven away at high speed, it will careen into a parked car, lift into the air, corkscrew 360°, and explode like a napalm bomb. DNA testing is instantaneous. Every police department can do it. After all, there's no backlog in any of the labs, the tests are free, and every detective in the country is owed favors by every lab technician. Murder boards. Almost everyone in the country has a headshot photo on file, just in case. Also, "tech savvy" detectives can cross-reference digitized high school yearbooks, photos of amateur sports teams, country club membership records, delivery invoices from flower shops, off-shore bank records, etc., with three seconds of key rattling. I believe they use the "Deus Ex Machina" version of Google. |
| Van |
| vvvan@earthlink.net |
| http://www.vansfiction.net |
| Wednesday March 14 13:10:27 2012 Re: Küstenwache |
| old man wrote: If > hands are not tied behind the back, I'd rather see no > bondage at all, (well almost anyway). > Anyone have any thoughts on this? I'm on the other side, I like it more when the damsel has the choise to take her gag off but she keeps it on. I won't be complaining if she will be tied with tons of ropes/chains/tape either as long that she has tape/ball gag over her mouth. |
| Avi |
| Wednesday March 14 14:19:20 2012 The River? |
| Have there been any scenes so far from the cable series The River with Leslie Hope and Eloise Mumford? I don't get cable but from what I've seen of this show via stills and scenes it looks something akin to Lost, where we know Evangeline Lilly got a lot of classic scenes. I'd love to see Ms. Hope and Ms. Mumford get the same treatment, especially in a rugged terrain, all roped and sweaty and helpless. There is one photo from the show on IMDB that seems to show Ms. Hope already locked in some sort of cell, though I don't know the context, whether she's a "baddie" or what. But she's quite the milf in my book. |
| John |
| Wednesday March 14 14:47:24 2012 21 Jump Street |
| Any scenes with Ellie Kemper she plays a teacher interested in the Channing Tatum character I heard a rumor about it. |
| Wednesday March 14 15:06:30 2012 Re: Küstenwache |
| For me, it all depends on the type of scene. If you take last night's scene from 'Todd and the Book of Pure Evil (thanks, Sam!), the scene is clearly played partly for laughs. In that case, it doesn't bother me that her hands are tied in front. Especially because the actress keeps working her hands against the ropes in frustration, which is cute. If it's a scene that we the audience are suppossed to take seriously as a real kidnapping, it annoys me a little more. |
| Wednesday March 14 15:41:43 2012 Re: Küstenwache |
| old man wrote: If > hands are not tied behind the back, I'd rather see no > bondage at all, (well almost anyway). > Anyone have any thoughts on this? I agree that it makes me want to tear out my hair, and given the state of my follicular degeneration that's something I really can't afford to do. I don't feel probably quite as - well - snobbish about it as gag snobs seem to be about their issue. It means the scene most likely will never be a favorite of mine, but I still accept it. Maybe even enjoy it if the actress is really attractive and sells it well. But it's akin to "empty calories" in food I suppose. Doesn't really satisfy me or leave me feeling full. |
| Cinch |
| Wednesday March 14 15:42:13 2012 Re: Fifty Shades of Grey |
| Zar wrote: > So in a tipping of hats to our community, it seems people > everywhere are going crazy about Fifty Shades of Grey - > that dwells on the BDSM relationship between a dominant > male and a female who gradually moves into submissive > space. Anyone read the book and have any highlights to > share on the BDSM content? I just read a news story about this, came here to ask the same thing. You guys, this book is HUGE, #1 ebook on the New York Times bestseller list, and 5th AND 8th best selling book on Amazon.com at the moment, somehow. It's supposed to be pretty inanely written (it was initially conceived as Twilight fan fiction apparently, Jesus Christ), but having a book about a BDSM relationship becoming this popular has got to bode well for adaptations, right? And, I mean, look at how many Twilight ripoffs you're seeing in bookstores and theatres right now. If 50 Shades of Grey becomes popular, maybe it'll inspire similar ripoffs that will be right up our alley. I really don't want to bite the bullet and read this thing, but I have to admit to being awfully curious about how the bondage in the story is. Any volunteers? |
 |
| Despite |
| Wednesday March 14 15:47:22 2012 Re: Küstenwache |
| old man wrote: >(unless there > is additional rope rigging, like arms tied to body). If > hands are not tied behind the back, I'd rather see no > bondage at all, (well almost anyway). > Anyone have any thoughts on this?< I feel the same way. Unless her hands are tied behind her back, or over her head, it's not a realistic bondage scene. Having a damsel's hands tied together in front of her usually does nothing for me. |
| Doug R |
| http://knotbuster.deviantart.com/ |
| Wednesday March 14 17:01:37 2012 Re: Küstenwache |
| Van wrote: > there's a "hands tied in front" issue also. > Thoughts? Only the usual, that movie (and TV) makers > fall into inexplicable cliches all the time, some of > which become enshrined in the public psyche. "Hands > tied in front = helpless" is only one example. Oh, absolutely true. But, for ***OUR*** interests/tastes, I think it's like, a "very hollow victory," to use a sports term/jargon... we're stuck with the "slop" being presented to us. |
| old man |
| Wednesday March 14 17:15:25 2012 Re: Küstenwache |
| Cinch wrote: > But it's akin to "empty calories" in food I > suppose. Doesn't really satisfy me or leave me feeling > full. Well put, cinch. |
| old man |
| Wednesday March 14 19:20:03 2012 Re: Fifty Shades of Grey |
| Despite wrote: > Zar wrote: > > So in a tipping of hats to our community, it seems > people > > everywhere are going crazy about Fifty Shades of > Grey - It seemed inevitable this trend would bubble up to the mainstream sooner or later, given the popularity of pulp fiction of this sort--see the "Elora's Cave" series, among others. |
| ss |
| Wednesday March 14 19:37:19 2012 Re: The River? |
| John wrote: > Have there been any scenes so far from the cable series > The River with Leslie Hope and Eloise Mumford? THE RIVER is on ABC. I watched the first (2 part) episode to see if there is women-in-bondage potential in this series. The preview for the second episode showed Leslie Hope getting handgagged. However, I did not watch or record the second episode so I do not know any details about the scene. I did not watch any other episodes so I do not know if there have been any other women-in-bondage scenes. Leslie Hope was bound and gagged in an episode of LEVEL 9. It is a great scene. |
| Zarak |
| Wednesday March 14 19:53:20 2012 Re: 21 Jump Street |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Any scenes with Ellie Kemper she plays a teacher > interested > in the Channing Tatum character I heard a rumor about it. No nothing happens in it at all. |
| Wednesday March 14 20:05:16 2012 Re: Corazon Valiente |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: (unsigned poster) Reason: Off-topic. |
| The Moderator |
|
|