|
|
This page is for posting links to online streaming video, Youtube and things like that. The rules are somewhat looser than Discussion. You can post and discuss mainstream and related amateur video. Do not post clips from commercial videos. It's usually not that hard to tell the difference.
|
|
| Sunday April 06 00:36:35 2008 Re: Deleted accounts thought |
| Captureher wrote: > I have a > feeling youtube censors frown on this site and probably > use it as a basis to delete accounts. I could be wrong. Given the sheer volume of traffic that passes through YouTube every day, I find that EXTREMELY unlikely. |
| Not a Guest |
| Sunday April 06 01:53:56 2008 Re: Sarah Jessica Parker |
| The House of Le Bastard wrote: > Off to YouTube! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FglPZT433U&feature=related It's at the 5-minute mark. To find this, I had to endure her retaliation handgag and other assorted B.S. from this awful show. |
| The House of Le Bastard |
| Sunday April 06 07:06:44 2008 Payak Rai Sab E Lee ep. 10 (1/9) |
| Again a scene from this new Lakorn, this time involving one of the three female leads, Bussakorn "Noi" Punnawes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mG2yJH40N4 You can choose between at least three versions of this episode, the two I post below have even better sound: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzfw_2jZ7A (as Payak Sao Saab E Li) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7E2Y-vTOYA (as Payak Sow Sab E-Lhee) "Noi", wearing an elegant black dress, is captured while attending a party and snooping around; she serves as the hostage for one of the evil guys and is held at gunpoint: While she isn't tied up, she has been otm-gagged with a greyish shawl (the gagging's taken place already in the previous episode because she talked too much, but this wasn't shown). By chance, she is able to break free and ungag herself, then knocking out the baddie. |
| Guest |
| Sunday April 06 14:39:50 2008 Re: Sarah Jessica Parker |
| > To find this, I had to endure her retaliation handgag and > other assorted B.S. from this awful show. Your bravery is duly noted. |
| SLJ |
| Sunday April 06 15:23:21 2008 Re: Deleted accounts thought |
| Not a Guest wrote: > Captureher wrote: > I have a feeling youtube censors , I find that EXTREMELY unlikely. Really, then why would they do it? It's not copyright, as it's legal to show clips and millions of other users show everything, soaps, tv show, movies; that's what youtube is all about. The copyright issue came up when youtube was sold recently and it involved them running entire episodes of new shows, it was never about people posting clips or scenes. |
| Sunday April 06 15:23:36 2008 video editor |
| I have lots of mainstream bondage I'd like to edit and post. Does anyone know of a free video editor I could use. I used video redo before my free trail ended and That was a long time ago. |
| Sunday April 06 15:55:04 2008 Re: Dirty Dancing |
| Tape gagged kissing, wow! P.S. Watch the typo. |
| Sunday April 06 20:07:01 2008 Re: Deleted accounts thought |
| Captureher wrote: > Just an idea; since many websites track the origins of > direct links (to see who is hosting them) try to post > your link in this forum without hitting return > afterwards, or simply put a space within it to force the > viewer to cut and paste into another browser. I have a > feeling youtube censors frown on this site and probably > use it as a basis to delete accounts. I could be wrong. I have the same feeling too. They can trace the link via its referer that is brianspage.com. As you can see many underground community wants every member to code the link so that others can't trace that website |
| Izy7 |
| http://www.youtube.com/izy7 |
| Sunday April 06 20:24:05 2008 Re: Deleted accounts thought |
| It has nothing to do with this site in particular. It has to do with keyword and searchwords used in reference to clips on youtube and constant vigilant patrolling for "pornography" by the youtube staff. Once one member's chanel in confirmed as a hotbed of "pornography," a simple sweep of his favorites and/or friend's list will quickly turn up other culprits. No doubt red-trigger words on sights like youtube include the word "bondage." It certainly makes it easy to find these bannable member's chanels when simillar bondage-themed chanels are linked up via favorites, chanels, etc. (unavoidable) but ESPECIALLY easy when they are subscribed to some poor nitwit's videos that may include unintentional bondage. Gee, you don't think they might find that creepy and report it to youtube? |
| SLJ |
| Sunday April 06 21:36:57 2008 Re: Deleted accounts thought |
| SLJ wrote: > It has nothing to do with this site in particular. It has > to do with keyword and searchwords used in reference to > clips on youtube and constant vigilant patrolling for > "pornography" by the youtube staff. Once one > member's chanel in confirmed as a hotbed of > "pornography," a simple sweep of his favorites > and/or friend's list will quickly turn up other culprits. > No doubt red-trigger words on sights like youtube include > the word "bondage." That's correct. To many posters here, this may seem like a harmless hobby, but to the outside world, it's nothing more than another flavor of porn. That's the problem. It's not impossible to imagine a circumstance where copyright could be an issue, of course, but that's not the reason DiD clip sites are deleted from youtube. |
| TMJ |
|
|