|
|
This page is for posting links to online streaming video, Youtube and things like that. The rules are somewhat looser than Discussion. You can post and discuss mainstream and related amateur video. Do not post clips from commercial videos. It's usually not that hard to tell the difference.
|
|
| Wednesday May 07 00:42:16 2008 'Talking with tape and hands behind back' |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: (unsigned poster) Reason: Age concern. |
| The Moderator |
| Wednesday May 07 00:43:47 2008 Re: 'Talking with tape and hands behind back' |
| Magickrat wrote: > Ahhh. I understand where people might be a little weary, > but it's a pretty G rated video That doesn't matter. There is a strict prohibition on anything like that due to the overall content of the site. |
| The Moderator |
| Wednesday May 07 00:45:48 2008 Re: 'Talking with tape and hands behind back' |
| Chris wrote: > I think Brian is fully capable of making that > determination on his own don't you think? You're 100% wrong. It is not only everyone's right to raise a point of order when they feel that a post violates rules, it is their duty. This is the CORRECT way to do it. I don't view every video. |
| The Moderator |
| Wednesday May 07 00:57:30 2008 Re: 'Talking with tape and hands behind back' |
| The Moderator wrote: > Chris wrote: > > I think Brian is fully capable of making that > > determination on his own don't you think? > You're 100% wrong. It is not only everyone's right to > raise a point of order when they feel that a post > violates > rules, it is their duty. This is the CORRECT way to do > it. > I don't view every video. Well forgive me sir, if I choose to shirk that duty. I've got better things to do then being a damn tattletale. If someone violates a rule, they'll either get caught or they won't. It's not my problem I have this "amazing ability" to simply ignore or scroll past anything that might offend me. Do with this message what you like but that's how I feel and won't have my mind changed either way. |
| Chris |
| Wednesday May 07 02:35:55 2008 Re: 'Talking with tape and hands behind back' |
| Chris wrote: The Moderator wrote: Chris wrote: right to raise a point of order when they feel that a post violates rules, it is their duty. This is the CORRECT way to do it. Well forgive me sir, if I choose to shirk that duty. I've got better things to do then being a damn tattletale. If someone violates a rule, they'll either get caught or they won't. You didn't read what he said. He said if you "feel" a post violates a rule, it's your duty to bring it up. Obviously, if you don't feel that way, or don't care, you have no duty to do anything. |
| Tony LaRussa |
| Wednesday May 07 05:39:07 2008 Re: Trapos Intimos |
| skezemuth wrote: > > Wow. Great scene. Damsel is Marlene De Andrede. > Looks > > like the premise is some sort of fashion model > agency. > Thanks for that, I never saw that beginning part. I > caught the next episode with the scene still in progress Is there a part 3? There looked to be more in a preview at the end of the clip. |
| Max |
| Wednesday May 07 08:16:33 2008 Re: Trapos Intimos |
| Max wrote: > Is there a part 3? There looked to be more in a preview > at the end of the clip. No, that's all, unfortunately. I can verify this. All that happened next was she smacked in the face the guy she had been tied to. Probably for having that accidental orgasm while she lay on top of him. |
| skezemuth |
| Wednesday May 07 08:30:16 2008 Re: 'Talking with tape and hands behind back' |
| The Moderator wrote: > That doesn't matter. There is a strict prohibition on > anything like that due to the overall content of the > site. Totally understandable... |
| Magickrat |
| magickrat@live.com |
| Wednesday May 07 13:23:47 2008 Re: Trapos Intimos |
| skezemuth wrote: > Max wrote: > > > Is there a part 3? There looked to be more in a > preview > > at the end of the clip. > No, that's all, unfortunately. I can verify this. All > that happened next was she smacked in the face the guy > she had been tied to. Probably for having that accidental > orgasm while she lay on top of him. Does anyone know what happened at the beginning of this scene? Were they forced to strip before they were tied, and is there a clip of the woman in the white bra and panties in the background being tied and gagged? |
| boing! |
| Wednesday May 07 19:52:05 2008 H.I.T. |
| One of the LARGEST black tape gags to date! Good scene. |
| http://youtube.com/watch?v=V79P4pdpIGo |
| Wednesday May 07 23:21:13 2008 Re: Trapos Intimos |
> Does anyone know what happened at the beginning of this > scene? Were they forced to strip before they were tied, > and is there a clip of the woman in the white bra and > panties in the background being tied and gagged? I remember when this one originally aired and wondered about the damsel in the background. When someone came to rescue them, it was as if she wasn't there. She wasn't seen anymore and nobody made any reference to her. The only conclusion I could come to is that she's unintentionally in the scene and is not really suppose to be there. |
| hallbird |
|
|