|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Sunday October 02 00:42:09 2011 Re: Charlie's Angels (episode #2) |
| Charlies Angels ratings have collapsed. It is almost certain it will be cancelled. The only question is whether they will bother producing a 'back nine' additional episodes for the season, or quit after four. I think it depends on whether the network thinks it owes Drew Barrymore a favor or not. |
| ss |
| Sunday October 02 02:18:47 2011 Dream House |
| For all those wondering about Naomi Watts in the new movie. She gets knocked via chloroform, and then later tied hands above head. Sadly no gag, and scene only last about two min. |
| Sunday October 02 02:24:42 2011 Chemistry on Cinemax |
The new erotic late night show on Cinemax entitled "Chemistry" about a guy carrying on with two women, one of whom is a cop, had a full treatment sex scene in the latest episode "Downtime." In it, the sister of one of the women in the triangle is busy getting it on while riding in a sex swing. She's wearing nothing but a ball gag. There's a tinge of comedy to the scene, which occurs about three minutes in and lasts about a minute (sometimes she has the gag in, sometimes not). It repeats tomorrow night in the early morning hours (1:15 a.m. CST Monday) and once again (at least) on Tuesday at 11:30 p.m. |
| KEVIN |
| Sunday October 02 05:19:51 2011 Re: Chemistry on Cinemax |
| Look at the end credits and try to get the actresses name. I don't have cinemax. |
| joe |
| Sunday October 02 05:23:24 2011 Re: Charlie's Angels (episode #2) |
| Now that NBC says they are giving Free agents and Playboy club more time to improve, Charlie's Angels could be the first to get the ax. The real question becomes if they produce their 13 episode order or if production will get cut before then. If it does, were looking at a Saturday night at 10 burnoff sometime this season. At the way it's going, it's definitely getting pulled no later than next month for sweeps. They might air episodes in December. It improved quality wise last week but not in the ratings. I hope they keep at least through Angels in Chains. |
| joe |
| Sunday October 02 09:01:04 2011 Re: General Hospital |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: ! > For god's sake, nobody said she was tied up. That's the > promo photo they released. Actially the poster who originally brought this pic up said she was. He also said it was on a bed. |
| Sunday October 02 14:42:41 2011 Re: General Hospital |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: The Answer Reason: This went non-productive quickly. |
| The Moderator |
| Sunday October 02 15:03:14 2011 Re: Charlie's Angels (episode #2) |
| joe wrote:Now that NBC says they are giving Free agents and Playboy club more time to improve, Charlie's Angels could be the first to get the ax. Charlie's Angels airs on ABC. |
| Walter |
| Sunday October 02 15:23:23 2011 Re: Charlie's Angels (episode #2) |
| Walter wrote: > joe wrote:Now that NBC says they are giving Free agents > and Playboy club more time to improve, Charlie's Angels > could be the first to get the ax. > Charlie's Angels airs on ABC. I think the meaning of that sentence is, since NBC is not in a hurry to can its two duds, ABC may be the first network to cancel a show this season. |
| ss |
| Sunday October 02 17:14:29 2011 Re: Charlie's Angels (episode #2) |
| ss wrote: I think the meaning of that sentence is, since NBC is not in a hurry to can its two duds, ABC may be the first network to cancel a show this season... Thanks ss, that makes sense! |
| walter |
| Sunday October 02 17:39:22 2011 Re: Charlie's Angels (episode #2) |
| Walter wrote: >Charlie's Angels > could be the first to get the ax. > Charlie's Angels airs on ABC. People need to relax. ABC is not canceling this show after 3 or 4 episodes. They have heavily promoted it, and appear committed to it at least for the original 13 episodes. If it gets canceled, it likely won't be for a couple months. These are the ratings from its second episode. Charlie's Angels is still way ahead of the terrible NBC sitcoms, and not that far behind the CBS and FOX shows, which ABC knows they are not beating. Unless it drops another 20 percent next week, they will be fine. CBS: "Big Bang Theory" (14.5 million, 8.7/15)/"How to be a Gentleman" (9 million, 5.5/9) FOX: "The X Factor" (11.3 million, 6.6/11) ABC: "Charlie's Angels" (7.2 million, 4.7/8) NBC: "Community" (4 million, 2.6/4)/"Parks and Recreation" (4.4 million, 2.7/4) The CW: "The Vampire Diaries" (2.7 million, 1.7/3) |
| Sunday October 02 17:44:11 2011 Re: Charlie's Angels (episode #2) |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: >Charlie's > Angels is still way ahead of the terrible NBC sitcoms, > and not that far behind the CBS and FOX shows Correction, they are well behind those shows, but they are not expected to compete with those shows for total viewers anyways. Also, the first show getting canceled is that show behind "Big Bang Theory" which is losing 5 million viewers from its lead-in. |
| Sunday October 02 17:44:33 2011 charlie,s angels |
| the show is number 3 in it,s time slot beating nbc comedy lineup for the second straight week if it stays steady it will get a full season pickup. |
| charles thomas |
| Sunday October 02 19:38:40 2011 Re: The Playboy Club |
| Brian Guevara wrote: > Playboy Club... pics of famous actresses who > were once bunnies. One is a great pic of a very young, > very sexy Susan Sullivan wearing the outfit. She is > holding her hands behind her back. Man I would love to > see Mad Dan get a hold of this pic! Thanks for the tip, Brian. There is one on Google Image of her holding a tray, but not with her hands behind her back. It's usable though, with a bit of TLC. Meanwhile, here's a bunnyfied Reese Witherspoon in some distress... |
 |
| Mad Dan |
| http://www.dansdidnts.com |
| Sunday October 02 20:10:42 2011 Desperate Housewives (late alert) |
| The preview for tonight's episode shows "Susan" (Teri Hatcher) being arrested and handcuffed (hands behind back). |
| Kaman |
| Sunday October 02 20:35:12 2011 Re: Charlie's Angels (episode #2) |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > People need to relax. ABC is not canceling this show > after 3 or 4 episodes. They have heavily promoted it, and > appear committed to it at least for the original 13 > episodes. One of the best ways to promote a show to the general audience is to show a bound and gagged woman in the advertisements. Will ABC promote Minka Kelly bound and gagged in the advertisements for "Angels in Chains"? We will see at the end of the next episode. |
| Kaman |
| Sunday October 02 20:45:14 2011 Max Payne 3 |
| She appears to be tied up. Or her hands could be just held behind her back, but still the game features a kidnapping scenario. |
 |
| Abel |
| Sunday October 02 22:50:52 2011 Re: Desperate Housewives (late alert) |
| Kaman wrote: > The preview for tonight's episode shows "Susan" > (Teri Hatcher) being arrested and handcuffed (hands > behind back). "Susan" (Teri Hatcher) is handcuffed twice in tonight's episode. The first time, she is handcuffed with her hands in front (no gag). The second time (the scene from the preview), she is handcuffed with her hands behind her back (no gag). |
| Kaman |
| Sunday October 02 23:59:13 2011 The Hunt for the I-5 Killer - alert |
| There's a waitress bound (hands behind back) and tape-gagged about an hour and 15 minutes into this movie. She's wearing just her bra and panties. Just one shot. Movie is just about to air again at 11:00 p.m. CT on Lifetime. |
| Dextor |
| http:// |
|
|