|
|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
| Thursday March 21 01:40:58 2019 Re: Voice Actors |
| On March 20 2019 Richie wrote: > When a cartoon character is gagged, is the actress too? > or do they just make the noise? I don't imagine they tie up the actress if her cartoon character is tied up. |
| Thursday March 21 07:28:17 2019 Las munecas de la mafia 2 |
| Second season of 2009 Colombian narconovela with a mostly new cast is available on Netflix in US. Paula Barrero is handgagged and bound in ep 1-2; Paola Rey is chloroformed and bound in ep 28, Carla Giraldo gets knotted cleave in ep 28, much anguish as guy in same predicament is tortured; Katherine Escobar is cleave gagged on screen in ep 44, it turns into an OTM at times, continues in next episode; long cleave-gag scene for Amparo Grisales at end of ep 49 and half of ep 51; Paula Barreto is cleave-gagged in ep 57; and Katherine Escobar has brief cleave-gag scene in ep 60. Pics from ep 28, 44, 49, 57 & 60. |
 |
 |
 |
| Thursday March 21 08:26:31 2019 Re: Las munecas de la mafia 2 |
| On March 21 2019 (unsigned poster) wrote: > Second season of 2009 Colombian narconovela with a mostly > new cast is available on Netflix in US. > Paula Barrero is handgagged and bound in ep 1-2; Paola > Rey is chloroformed and bound in ep 28, Carla Giraldo > gets knotted cleave in ep 28, much anguish as guy in same > predicament is tortured; Katherine Escobar is cleave > gagged on screen in ep 44, it turns into an OTM at times, > continues in next episode; long cleave-gag scene for > Amparo Grisales at end of ep 49 and half of ep 51; Paula > Barreto is cleave-gagged in ep 57; and Katherine Escobar > has brief cleave-gag scene in ep 60. > Pics from ep 28, 44, 49, 57 & 60. first many thanks for the infos! but unfortunately, I live in the country that cannot watch the netflix because of region restriction. From quick googling, there are indeed no source available, and caracol tv is also reg restricted. Can you edited those scenes? if you don't have a time for editing I don't mind RAW version. thanks in advance! |
| El Grande |
| Thursday March 21 09:41:21 2019 Re: Deletions |
| On March 20 2019 The Moderator wrote: > On March 20 2019 (unsigned poster) wrote: > > Celebrities putting duct tape over their mouth to > protest > > against Proposition h8 = on topic > We had a forum discussion years ago about the subject. > I don't think there is any inconsistency or ambiguity. Why was there a need for a forum discussion about it? It clearly breaks three forum rules. Proposition 8 was a California ballot proposition and a state constitutional amendment. So, the celebrities were making political statements. Political statements are off topic. This was a protest against the state constitutional amendment. Political protests are off topic. The political protest was over a real life event. Real life events are off topic. You don't see this as being inconsistent with forum rules? You don't see this as selective censorship over the forum? |
| Thursday March 21 11:11:10 2019 Re: Deletions |
| On March 21 2019 (unsigned poster) wrote: > Why was there a need for a forum discussion about it? It > clearly breaks three forum rules. Proposition 8 was a > California ballot proposition and a state constitutional > amendment. So, the celebrities were making political > statements. Political statements are off topic. This was > a protest against the state constitutional amendment. > Political protests are off topic. The political protest > was over a real life event. Real life events are off > topic. You don't see this as being inconsistent with > forum rules? You don't see this as selective censorship over the forum? Tuning you might be overthinking it a tad. Pretty clear the stance is that it’s okay to post the pictures and discuss the photo shoots, but to get into a discussion about WHY the actresses are participating would become off topic. A lot of people who cry about “censorship” don’t understand how important it is to have a well moderated forum so it doesn’t fly off the rails. |
| Thursday March 21 11:22:16 2019 Re: Deletions |
| On March 21 2019 (unsigned poster) wrote: > Why was there a need for a forum discussion about it? Because I had asked about changes to the rules. We added an exception for celebrities. Why is that hard to understand? No discussion of the politics was allowed, of course. This is not a new discussion. The decision was made at the time, that became the new rules. I have explained, which you can agree or disagree with the decision but that's not change anything. |
| The Moderator |
| Thursday March 21 14:09:48 2019 Re: Deletions |
| On March 21 2019 (unsigned poster) wrote: > On March 21 2019 (unsigned poster) wrote: >. A lot of people who cry about “censorship” I'm not CRYING and I wasn't writing to you. Thank you for the cheap shot. |
| Thursday March 21 14:18:41 2019 Re: Deletions |
| On March 19 2019 The Moderator wrote: > > and penchant for selective censorship. > I'd like to hear more about this. What exact problems do > you see? Anyone with concerns can always raise the > issue. I'm ready to discuss or explain in open forum > at any time. I was responding to this post. The Moderator wrote that he would like to hear more about his penchant for selective censorship. I pointed out an exact problem that I saw. He wrote that he was willing to discuss or explain in open forum at any time. |
| Thursday March 21 14:20:35 2019 My question was answered |
| The Moderator answered my questions. I'm moving on. |
| Thursday March 21 18:42:09 2019 Re: Deletions |
| I'm not sure why, but there seems to be some problem understanding that one rule can override another. A new *rule was added that allowed some stuff by celebrities that isn't generally allowed. It's possible that some people were unhappy that it seemed like a backdoor way to promote the anti-8 campaign. I don't recall anyone complaining about that specifically. Remember that chains of logic don't work. This isn't a court where precedent and the law can work to provide a strange outcome. I can change any rules at any time to get the result I want. That's part of the whole dictatorship thing. * Most of these "rules" are in my head, of course. But that time I did post it. I tried to find that old discussion but failed. Either the wrong search terms or not back far enough. |
| The Moderator |
| Thursday March 21 18:43:17 2019 Re: Deletions |
| On March 21 2019 (unsigned poster) wrote: > On March 21 2019 (unsigned poster) wrote: > > On March 21 2019 (unsigned poster) wrote: > >. A lot of people who cry about “censorship” > I'm not CRYING and I wasn't writing to you. Thank you for > the cheap shot. Yeah, let's be more mindful of how things are phrased. I don't think it was intended to be insulting but I can see how it might be taken that way. |
| The Moderator |
| Thursday March 21 20:35:50 2019 Re: Voice Actors |
| Laura Vandervoort goes all out |
| https://www.instagram.com/p/BroSNkhFgR7/ |
| Thursday March 21 20:50:22 2019 Re: Las munecas de la mafia 2 |
| On March 21 2019 (unsigned poster) wrote: > Second season of 2009 Colombian narconovela with a mostly > new cast is available on Netflix in US. > Pics from ep 28, 44, 49, 57 & 60. Thanks for posting. Will look out for it. Hopefully someone can get the scenes eventually. Really like to look of the first two pictures |
| McGill |
| Thursday March 21 21:46:15 2019 Re: American Woman |
| Official sypnosis, which mentions Sarah Gadon's character being kidnapped: https://www.tribecafilm.com/filmguide/american-woman-2019 With this being a fictionalized re-telling of the Patty Hearst kidnapping it's likely to take some creative license with the actual events. Here's to hoping we get some good B&G action with Sarah. I can't seem to find any images indicative of a scene but this is one to keep eyes open for for sure. |
|
|