|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
Sunday November 03 00:08:04 2013 Re: Rating System |
hangdogit wrote: Before retiring, I designed and maintained Notes > databases, and can say that planning, implementing, and > maintaining them and upgrades like this proposed one are > a lot of work. I know I can't try to (and I damn sure know I should never TRY to) speak for the Mod, but I do know I personally wouldn't ask him to do any more for this board. He's provided an incredibly valuable resource for free (to us, not to him) for a long time now, all while putting up with a hell of a lot of crap. (And I've been guilty of shoveling some of that crap myself.) Just speaking for myself, I'm more than content with the status quo. |
Miss Cleo |
Sunday November 03 00:54:52 2013 Re: Preacher's Mistress |
Not a bad scene, short but sweet. Some nice close-ups of her gagged face. Look forward to downloading the video and caps of this later. |
Sunday November 03 01:50:26 2013 Re: Rating System |
I would assume that any ratings systems would be for your own use and not for anything to do with the maintenance of the site. |
The Engineer |
Sunday November 03 01:34:38 2013 Thai |
Any indian or thai actress? |
Sam Steffen |
steffen1223@aol.com |
Sunday November 03 02:35:00 2013 Re: Preacher's Mistress |
(unsigned poster) wrote: Not bad, but was hoping for more. Lancaster is smoking hot. Looked good to finally see her in a gag. Or you could check the D.B. and see: Record number: 1517 Title: Pacific Blue Medium: TV Series Actress: Sarah Lancaster, Unknown Description: Episode: "Best Laid Plans" (3.22) Lancaster is tied to a bed in an upper-half spreadeagle and cleave gagged with a white cloth. She's wearing a short black crop-top and Daisy Dukes. Plenty of midriff is showing. Good scene. Plenty of close ups. |
Walter |
Sunday November 03 08:07:51 2013 Re: Preacher's Mistress |
Walter wrote: > (unsigned poster) wrote: Not bad, but was hoping for > more. Lancaster is smoking hot. Looked good to finally > see her in a gag. > Or you could check the D.B. and see: Lancaster doesn't even look like the same actress in that PB scene. I meant more of recent look in recent years. She was only 18 in that scene. She's another actress that looks better as she gets older, although just 33 now. |
Sunday November 03 09:29:07 2013 Re: Rating System |
Werwohlf wrote: > Could we > establish a rating system for the scenes we love?... > The final system could look much different, but I really would like to start this discussion. I really like this idea. Basically a shorthand description of what's in a scene. It would be great for the links on the video page, but the truth is most people don't even bother to include basic information, like approximate timecodes for a 90 minute video, that it might be difficult to get people on board with. And it's really a separate idea, and I accept probably impossibly to implement, but I do wish there was a (simpler) ratings system for the DB as well. Like just a rank out of 10, that everyone could vote on. I know everyone has their own preferences but the aggregate score would really help decide if a scene was worth hunting down or not. |
Jackrabbit |
Sunday November 03 10:03:57 2013 Re: Rating System |
Jackrabbit wrote: > I really like this idea. Basically a shorthand > description of what's in a scene. I was thinking of trying something like that with my uploads, both here & on Rob's, but there's no way to standardize it. Raffish had (and still has) a good tags/keywords system on his site for an abundance of descriptive terms, but I don't see any way for that to work on the Video Page, let alone the dB; there's enough sparse/incorrect entries on there as it is, although I've tried doing my part in sprucing some of them up with descriptive prose, accurate timecodes, camerawork, lighting, damsels' attire, etc. As far as scene ratings go, regular uploaders could start tagging their edits with something like "Jackrabbit Certified Highlight!" or "Sam's Pick!", but that sounds waaaaay too presumptuous & subjective. ;-) |
Sam |
Sunday November 03 10:27:44 2013 Re: Rating System |
Sam wrote: > I was thinking of trying something like that with my > uploads, both here & on Rob's, but there's no way to > standardize it. I agree. The more I think about it, the more I realise a shorthand would be impossible to get people to agree on, or to remember what everything refers to. The best I think we could maybe get would be to end video posts with something along of the lines of this: Rating: 8/10 Hands: Behind Legs: N Material: Tape Gag: Tape Blindfold: N Nudity: N (an example I thought up based on Rookie Blue s04e01). The advantage of this is that it wouldn't need to be completely standardized, people could include what information they like, and no one would need to memorize anything, because it's fairly self explanatory. > As far as scene ratings go, regular uploaders could start > tagging their edits with something like "Jackrabbit > Certified Highlight!" or "Sam's Pick!", > but that sounds waaaaay too presumptuous & subjective. ;-) lol I'm trademarking that. Except 'Sam's pick' sounds better. I need a more succinct name. |
Jackrabbit |
Sunday November 03 10:30:19 2013 Re: Rating System |
Jackrabbit wrote: > Rating: 8/10 > Hands: Behind > Legs: N > Material: Tape > Gag: Tape > Blindfold: N > Nudity: N Although when I posted this I included spaces so that everything would be lined up on the right and easier to read at a glance, but I guess the forum code doesn't allow that. |
Jackrabbit |
Sunday November 03 10:36:06 2013 Re: Rating System |
Jackrabbit wrote: > but I do wish there was a (simpler) ratings system > for the DB as well. Nope. In general we want the DB to be factual. A thorough description should be all that is needed. |
The Moderator |
Sunday November 03 10:37:16 2013 Re: La ruta blanca |
doc wrote: > Had a quick scene in this show today Is it up on one of your pages? |
Sunday November 03 10:48:00 2013 Re: La ruta blanca |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > doc wrote: > > Had a quick scene in this show today > Is it up on one of your pages? I do not know the episode, it aired yesterday. It is not on one of my pages. My video capture software crashed so I no longer have the ability to upload scenes that I have recorded onto my DVDs. So while I have the scene I can not share it unless I find it on the web. |
doc |
Sunday November 03 11:27:50 2013 Re: Preacher's Mistress |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > She's another actress that > looks better as she gets older, although just 33 now. Few not so great caps until we can get a better version. |
Sunday November 03 12:21:32 2013 Hollyoaks this week |
Reminder to any British here that an article said that the November 6 episode of Hollyoaks will have a hostage scene involving three women and some men. It said that at least one of the women gets bound and gagged. |
Sunday November 03 12:32:27 2013 Re: Rating System |
Our tastes vary far too widely for any standardized system to be useful. One person's 8 is often another's 2 and vice versa. Just an odd aspect of this particular predilection. The best we can hope for is for posters to as specific as possible (within reason) about scenes, be sure to include times, and (my biggest pet peeve) take a few extra seconds to make sure you've spelled the damsel's name (and title's name) right so they show up in searches. |
Miss Cleo |
Sunday November 03 12:35:42 2013 Or not to be |
To BE, that is. Stupid phone. :) |
Miss Cleo |
Sunday November 03 14:15:25 2013 Handcuffs soaps |
Can anyone upload images of female casts on British soaps in handcuffs ie from eastenders corrie or emmerdale Cheers |
Gregory |
Sunday November 03 17:18:02 2013 Re: Rating System |
Two helpful things are if any putzes are in the scene and if the actress is way old |
Sunday November 03 17:19:11 2013 Re: Rating System |
> Two helpful things are if any putzes are in the scene > and if the actress is way old So if damsel is B&G nicely but it's Kathy Bates, something like that |
Sunday November 03 18:27:29 2013 The Wrong Mans |
I know there was some chatter on here a few weeks back when Elilia Fox got tied and gagged in a couple of episodes, but i don't think any one has mentioned there was a further scene in the final episode that aired this week Sarah Soleman weaing a blue dress is cleave gagged and tied to a chair as part of the final showdown. Not a brilliant scene - she's mostly shot from a distance, remains in the background - but for my money Soleman is a fine looking actress and one hot damsel in distress |
Moxx of Balhoom |
Sunday November 03 18:38:13 2013 Re: Rating System |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > > Two helpful things are if any putzes are in the > scene > > and if the actress is way old > So if damsel is B&G nicely but it's Kathy Bates, > something like that Well, maybe something more like "unappealling" or "inappropriate" rather than "too old". Personally, if the damsel is hot looking, I am not really an "age" person. Who here wouldn't like to see Jaclyn Smith finally get a "tie-and-gag" scene? She sure doesn't look her age! Plus...some young pups here would consider any actress over 35 as "too old" or "past her prime". :-) |
Sunday November 03 22:51:34 2013 Emily VanCamp |
Facebook post just now: Emy VanCamp #JoeFazzio put tape on our mouths lol |
|