|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Tuesday November 26 02:11:15 2002 Re: Rework- Question? |
| > Brian:
> Whilst on the topic, many of the entries are still being > edited to fit TV Series/Movie format. Would appear then, the format system stays? We'll have to think of something to cut down on number of edits for this. David? |
| Tuesday November 26 02:20:37 2002 Re: Rework- Reference |
| This form allows you to add entries to the database.
A couple of guidelines: 1. You must have an entry in every field. If you don't know a name or something, ask first on the Discussion Page. And check the IMDB 2. You don't need to insert the labels, like Title: or Description:, the tool will do that automatically. 3. Try to be objective when you write the descriptions. Details of how, what, length, that sort of thing are much more important than your opinion of the scene. It's best to let people make up their own minds about it. 4. Only one episode of a TV show per entry. If you haven't checked the database to see if your entry is already there, please do so now! Duplicate entries will be removed. |
| Jay L |
| Tuesday November 26 09:27:53 2002 Re: Rework- Reference |
|
> 1. You must have an entry in every field. If you don't > know a name or something, ask first on the Discussion > Page. In principle a very good idea. My experience though: Did that 3 or 4 times. Never one answer. |
| Per |
| Tuesday November 26 12:04:53 2002 Re: Rework- Reference |
| > 1. You must have an entry in every field. If you don't > know a name or something, ask first on the Discussion > Page. "In principle a very good idea. My experience though: Did that 3 or 4 times. Never one answer." Well my friend, understand when you've taken your best shot at it, and no one else on Discussion knows either, I'm still taking note of any extra info in the posts to narrow down ep ID. You'd be suprised what odd little details can sometimes single out an ep in the guides. |
| Jay L |
| Tuesday November 26 16:41:04 2002 Re: Rework- Reference |
|
> Well my friend, > > understand when you > You'd be suprised Am I just being paranoid, or are your tone quite arrogant and hostile? I know we had our differences; OTOH you know I tried my best to contribute lately, in a positive spirit. So, I see no reason for you to act this way. If I am just misunderstanding I apoligize. |
| Per |
| Tuesday November 26 19:17:32 2002 Re: Rework- Reference |
| >
> Am I just being paranoid, or are your tone quite arrogant > and hostile? > I know we had our differences; OTOH you know I tried my > best to contribute lately, in a positive spirit. So, I > see no reason for you to act this way. > If I am just misunderstanding I apoligize. > And you should. I don't know how many times you've posted on this, but it needs to end. Jay doesn't diss ... trust me. Trust him. Let it drop. Now. |
| Biff |
| Tuesday November 26 19:56:44 2002 Re: Rework- Reference |
| "are your tone quite arrogant and hostile?" Huh? Go slow here, my friend. "you know I tried my best to contribute" Yes, agree you have. So our comments about posting on Discussion: "In principle a very good idea. My experience though: Did that 3 or 4 times. Never one answer." "Well my friend, understand when you've taken your best shot at it" Here I acknowledged your efforts "and no one else on Discussion knows either, I'm still taking note of any extra info in the posts to narrow down ep ID." Here acknowledged taking note of posts like this, for ep ID. "You'd be suprised what odd little details can sometimes single out an ep in the guides." Here acknowledged that posts like your's, can assist when going through an episode guide. "I see no reason for you to act this way." Well, I was just about to ask you what reason you figured I'd be hostile to you in the first place? Don't see where you're getting this impression from? |
| Jay L |
|
|