|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Thursday April 13 00:51:19 2006 Re: Hangdog's Post - 11932 |
| Jay L wrote:
> "Olga's Girls is definitely not a commercial bondage > movie of the likes of AES or Imago. I'd say that the > bondage scenes fill no more than 5% or so of the film's > length." > More going off the standard set awhile back > Problem being, > unable to bring up Discussion Page posts from the time. > Marked late Jan-2002. > Here from DB Corrections from the time: > "The goal is list items that may reasonably be seen on TV > or found in regular video outlets. Available only from > certain mail-order sources doesn't cut it." > 2 Net-Mail Order films, along with Todd 3-D's serial were > requested to be deleted. Along with this one. > At current, > I've found on a Seattle, USA based Net-Mail order site, > but none of the USA based general video stores: > Olga's House of Shame > White Slave's of Chinatown > Olga's Dance Hall Girls > So at moment it in same situation as say Todd 3D's > serial. > Have to check into some more. > Offhand, > not at US based Blockbuster store, > nor the big Rogers store near me Hello, I'd never expect to see Olga's Girls on commercial or cable TV (maybe an adult-video channel). And certainly not at Blockbuster or a similar video store. It is available on NetFlix, which has some movies like Olga's Girls -- sexploitation type, I think they're called. I do apologise for unintentionally starting a meta-discussion about appropriateness (I've seen this type of discussion before and pretty much hate it) -- my intent was simply to provide information to others who might be interested in this unusual film -- I already have seen it of course, so the listing was not for my benefit. Note that I did see some Japanese BDSM films listed in the database and thought that this was similar in content (i.e., bondage, Sadism, humiliation) -- I used those as my informal guide to appropriateness. But if it is inappropriate to the database purpose then it certainly needs to be deleted and won't bother me. Thanks for listening and investigating this situation. |
| Hangdog |
| Thursday April 13 10:31:32 2006 Re: 11932 |
| "I do apologise for unintentionally starting a meta-discussion about appropriateness"
(I've seen this type of discussion before and pretty much hate it)" What are you on about? "my intent was simply to provide information to others who might be interested in this unusual film -- I already have seen it of course, so the listing was not for my benefit." I realise that. "Note that I did see some Japanese BDSM films listed in the database" Which ones? |
| Jay L |
| Thursday April 13 14:33:46 2006 [11977] 2001 Maniacs (2005) |
| Just rented this movie. The second DiD is named Marla Leigh Malcom, not Marla Malcolm (the credits list her middle name, and her last name is "Malcom", not Malcolm")as is listed in the database entry. Thanks! |
| JP |
| japfeif@aol.com |
| Thursday April 13 16:18:51 2006 Re: [11977] 2001 Maniacs (2005) |
| JP wrote:
> The second DiD is named Marla > Leigh Malcom, not Marla Malcolm The poster was going by IMDB "Marla Malcolm" I'll fix that |
| Jay L |
| http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0539149/ |
|
|