|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
Friday March 18 01:31:35 2005 Re: Brian R |
Jay L wrote:
> "They love Canadians. Blame Canada! Blame Canada!" > Recall being snarked on about that here, > but this from a TV show??? The song was from the South Park movie, a feature-length version of the cartoon antics of the boys. |
Brian R |
Friday March 18 03:15:41 2005 [11234] Buck Rogers in the 25th Century |
Latest Entry: Record number: 11234 Title: Buck Rogers in the 25th Century Medium: TV Series Actress: Erin Gray Description: Episode: Return of the Fighting 69th (1.8) Peter Graves guest stars as a bomber commander brought out of retirement to lead a mission against a husband & wife criminals who've stolen nerve gas cannisters to their asteroid base. Buck Rogers & Colonel Wilma Deering's ship is shot down in the first bombing run, and the villains decide to revenge themselves on Deering, whose bombing mission against them years ago cost the man one eye and the woman her hands. They have guards shackle irons onto their ankles, then bring a blowtorch towards Rogers' face. They inform Deering she'll have to extinguish the flames on his face with her bare hands, just as she had to. Deering then grapples with the torch-wielder, just as Graves' second bombing run commences. Wilma Deering is clad in her white flight suit uniform. __________________________________________ I recall dealing with this before |
Jay L |
Friday March 18 03:20:31 2005 [703] Alias Smith and Jones |
One is gagged with red bandana, other blue one |
Friday March 18 03:36:42 2005 11234- Second, or Third Time On This One |
Record number: 11234 Title: Buck Rogers in the 25th Century Medium: TV Series Actress: Erin Gray Description: Episode: Return of the Fighting 69th (1.8) ___________________________________ Here posts from the previous time Tuesday July 20 17:43:30 2004 Re: Buck Rogers in the 25th Century ("Return of the Fighting 69th") (1.8) I added this to the Database last week. Did it get deleted (again) for lack of verification? Kinky-napper __________________________ Tuesday July 20 20:53:14 2004 Re: Buck Rogers in the 25th Century ("Return of the Fighting 69th") (1.8) "I added this to the Database last week. Did it get deleted (again) for lack of verification?" Shouldn't have been deleted yet, as currently 50 entries back. From notes: Title was off, Title: Buck Rogers in the 25th Century opposed to how all other series titles are: Title: Buck Rogers in the 25th Century (1979) Episode title off: no "" around the episode title like the other entries for ease of searching. Description: Erin Gray aka Col. Wilma Deering chained at ankles- has to put out flame with hands to save fella. Jay L ======================================= I was going to ask why the July 20th one was deleted, but noticed this most recent one has the exact same errors opposed to the existing entries as the previous one did as well Say Goodbye! |
Jay L |
Friday March 18 05:31:01 2005 11234 |
> Title: Buck Rogers in the 25th Century
opposed to how all other series titles are: > Title: Buck Rogers in the 25th Century (1979) > Episode title off: no "" around the episode title like the other entries for ease of searching. ~~~ That was one of my few entries to the Database -- sorry if I'm not at my best before my first cup of coffee. But is it possible to cut a little slack? Whacking an entry because the Title lacks (year) and quotation marks around "Episode title" -- that's hardly encouragement to persons who haven't contributed much since the new registration process. If these will be requirements, perhaps they could be added to the "Add an Entry" screen entry screen. |
Kinky-napper |
Friday March 18 11:44:21 2005 Re: Kinky-napper- 11234 |
"possible to cut a little slack?" In your case, yeah "Whacking an entry because the Title lacks (year) and quotation marks around "Episode title" No, it because this not the first time dealing with it. It's been deleted at least twice before, correct? "If these will be requirements, perhaps they could be added to the "Add an Entry" screen entry screen." It just a matter of entering same as previous ones for the Search line-up. Minor edit. Doesn't matter, as because it your's, I'm going to run it back in Will see what happened to previous two |
Jay L |
Friday March 18 11:49:02 2005 [11235] zorro |
This Entry Deleted: Record number: 11235 Title: zorro Medium: TV Series Actress: patrice camhi Description: Episode: an explosive situation |
Jay L |
Friday March 18 12:16:33 2005 11234 |
> "possible to cut a little slack?"
> In your case, yeah > Will see what happened to previous two ---- Thanks. It's been months since I'd added a Database entry (most of my time here is spent posting VCR Alerts) and I visit the Database Corrections page maybe once a month, so I wasn't aware that my prior entry(s) had not been successfully entered or why, until I did a search for it yesterday. |
Kinky-napper |
Friday March 18 15:45:41 2005 Re: Real Media Clip and Mark C Assist |
Re: Mark C: "Some actresses and thier character names. Yoyo Mung Ka Wai- Sunnie Fong Ching" Okay, from my cut down- double gagged, (but had to get the bound and gagged stunts in there), learned about the name difference in (Mandarin?) language sub-titles. Mark that for future ref. Got it ID'd now Mark C. Appreciate your assist here Again, that cut right down. This goes on for abit, with Yoyo having more action. Excellent stuff for a soap. |
Jay L |
Friday March 18 20:17:35 2005 Re: Kinky-napper- 11234 |
Jay L wrote:
> "possible to cut a little slack?" > In your case, yeah > "Whacking an entry because the Title lacks (year) and > quotation marks around "Episode title" These should be dealt with via the "Contact the contributer" tool, not removing otherwise good entries. > No, > it because this not the first time dealing with it. It's > been deleted at least twice before, correct? Why was it deleted before? |
Brian R |
Friday March 18 20:20:22 2005 Re: [11235] zorro |
Jay L wrote:
> This Entry Deleted: > Record number: 11235 Has this user been alerted? If not, I'll send one out. |
Brian R |
Friday March 18 21:28:13 2005 Re: Kinky-napper- 11234 |
Brian R wrote:
> These should be dealt with via the "Contact the > contributer" tool, not removing otherwise good > entries. How to know it a good entry? I recalled dealing with it before, post at time said 2nd try, so now this the what? 3rd time it's been entered. What to put in the Contact? "Why did you enter something someone else previously entered but was deleted?"? I didn't see Kinkynapper's name in the signature. Felt this between editors |
Jay L |
Friday March 18 21:44:28 2005 Re: Kinky-napper- 11234 |
Brian R wrote:
> Why was it deleted before? I don't know |
Jay L |
|