|
|
This page is for posting links to online streaming video, Youtube and things like that. The rules are somewhat looser than Discussion. You can post and discuss mainstream and related amateur video. Do not post clips from commercial videos. It's usually not that hard to tell the difference.
|
|
| Wednesday June 01 00:04:34 2016 Re: Russian Scene |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > Any chance someone could clip it, when it's available of > course (at time of posting it is available) Nice scene and > in 720p. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYn1gdDbuMY That video's horribly cropped. I found a better version, I'll clip it and post it here soon. |
| toadbutts |
| Wednesday June 01 00:46:38 2016 India - Siya ke Ram 31st May 2016 - Madirakshi Mundle chained (moved from The Discussion Page) |
| Hi, at 4.00 min to till end of the link http://www.desifive.com/video-pw-836136-31st-may-2016-siya-ke-ram-part1/836136-836204/ from start to end http://www.desifive.com/video-pw-836204-31st-may-2016-siya-ke-ram-part2/836136-836204/ |
| Sunny |
| Wednesday June 01 05:07:43 2016 Indisch Fur Anfaenger |
| Wolke Hegenbarth dose some early training for her Alles Klara role, short shorts and all. http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3yj5na_indisch-anfaenger_shortfilms |
| Scully |
| Wednesday June 01 05:20:23 2016 Re: Russian Scene |
| toadbutts wrote: > (unsigned poster) wrote: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYn1gdDbuMY > I'll clip a better version and post it here soon. Here you go. Great find. |
| toadbutts |
| https://mega.nz/#!F94AhZDJ!rBpj281Qqllb8ha5AJK90rIwJqKZWJ8gTMTCCFNYnV0 |
| Wednesday June 01 09:55:11 2016 Santa Barbara query |
| Anybody know which episode is this from? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhfOL1pEGWk Thanks in advance |
| Blackhammer |
| Wednesday June 01 10:18:08 2016 Re: Santa Barbara query |
| Blackhammer wrote: > Anybody know which episode is this from? It's a clip from a performance of Urinetown. Not too bad as it happens but unrelated to Santa Barbara, |
| Scully |
| Wednesday June 01 12:27:34 2016 Re: Santa Barbara query |
| Scully wrote: > It's a clip from a performance of Urinetown. Not too bad > as it happens but unrelated to Santa Barbara, Oops sorry. Here's the correct link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DumyEIYpN8k |
| Blackhammer |
| Wednesday June 01 12:31:57 2016 Re: Santa Barbara query |
| Better to put links in the Homepage section as some won't bother to copy and paste |
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DumyEIYpN8k |
| Wednesday June 01 13:46:59 2016 Re: Santa Barbara query |
| Blackhammer wrote: > Here's the correct link > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DumyEIYpN8k Record number: 3090 Title: Santa Barbara Medium: Soap Opera Actress: Kathy Shower Description: From Jan.'86: Former Playboy model Kathy plays "Janice"-Janice is attacked in her apartment, tied to a wicker chair and is gagged with a blue bandanna. |
| Spike917 |
| Wednesday June 01 16:41:44 2016 Re: Houdini & Doyle |
| Gagster wrote: > Emily Hampshire, in a very short scene. Now for the > important stuff - can any of you Brits tell me why the > policewoman has 0.12 on one side of her collar, and 12.0 > on the other? Is that normal for Scotland Yard, or did > the costumer screw up? I haven't seen the show, but I read that it's set in the late Victorian period, whereas Houdini and Doyle would more probably have collaborated (if they ever did) in the 1920s. There were no female police officers before World War 1, and a proper female branch of the Met was set up in the 20s. An image search reveals no uniform quite like that, but the "O" appears from contemporary male uniforms to be a departmental badge rather than part of the serial number, which would be as close to the front of the collar as possible. Male cops of the period have "MP" where the "O" would be, before the number on the officer's right side and after it on the left. Perhaps a police historian can enlighten us... |
| Wednesday June 01 18:20:32 2016 Re: Houdini & Doyle |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > I haven't seen the show, but I read that it's set in the > late Victorian period, whereas Houdini and Doyle would > more probably have collaborated (if they ever did) in the > 1920s. There were no female police officers before World > War 1, and a proper female branch of the Met was set up > in the 20s. > An image search reveals no uniform quite like that, but > the "O" appears from contemporary male uniforms > to be a departmental badge rather than part of the serial > number, which would be as close to the front of the > collar as possible. Male cops of the period have > "MP" where the "O" would be, before > the number on the officer's right side and after it on > the left. > Perhaps a police historian can enlighten us... The first episode opens with the banner "1901" (if I remember correctly). It's made clear that "Constable Adelaide Stratton" (Rebecca Liddiard's character) is unique, VERY experimential, and has been forced on the police establishment. How and why this happened is not at all clear (yet). Anyway, it IS quite clear that Adelaide's superiors are skeptical (meaning hostile) about the very idea of a female constable. Poetic license. By the way, look at the VERY cute publicity pic I just stumbled across! :-) |
 |
| Van |
| vansfiction@hotmail.com |
| http://www.vansfiction.net |
| Wednesday June 01 22:42:58 2016 Re: Houdini & Doyle |
| Van wrote: > > number, which would be as close to the front of the > > collar as possible. Male cops of the period have > > "MP" where the "O" would be, > before > > the number on the officer's right side and after it > on > > the left. > Poetic license. > By the way, look at the VERY cute publicity pic I just stumbled across! :-) http://www.vansfiction.net Wherever they got the idea, having the "12" close to the front and the "0" farther back makes for a clumsy way to read off the insignia. On the other hand, if they put the straitjacket in the show, I'm not going to care what numbers they use. |
| Gagster |
|
|