|
Welcome to the Discussion page. This forum is for discussing scenes from mainstream sources, primarily TV shows and movies, but we venture off into newspaper and magazine articles, stage plays, and other areas. Please do not post regarding commercial videos.
|
|
Saturday August 17 00:15:31 2013 Re: Video Mayhem [Hillside Stranglers discussion from 2004] |
Anubis wrote: > JDG wrote: > > This is from a LONG time ago, so I apologize right > off > > the bat...but this was one scene that I always > considered > > a decent but could have been WAY better but > apparently > > I've only seen the ''unrated'' version. I hate pure > close > > ups/panning. Was the other version a full shot of > her > > hogtied, meaning seeing her ENTIRE body on camera? > I'm > > going to look for it right now but I doubt I'll be > able > > to find the ''rated'' version since most people > probably > > preferred the ''unrated'' over it. But if someone > has the > > answer to this, I'd really appreciate not wasting my > time > > if it's not a full shot, which is what I'm looking > for. > I have them both, the rated version doesn't have a long > shot of her in place of the closeups. It's the same scene > just without the extra closeup and panning. The murder of > the hooker earlier in the movie while she's handcuffed > and tape gagged also goes on a little longer. Thanks for the prompt reply. So what is it exactly, just her face and the door opening with them coming in or is a little more of the body shown? Or is the ass, legs and feet not shown at all? Probably that, makes more sense if it's ''rated.'' Seriously, even if it's something I can piece together in photoshop. I've done it before with Easy Prey and a couple poorly shot commercial vids. |
JDG |
Saturday August 17 05:07:07 2013 Re: Video Mayhem [Hillside Stranglers discussion from 2004] |
JDG wrote: > So what is it exactly, just her face and the door opening > with them coming in or is a little more of the body > shown? Or is the ass, legs and feet not shown at all? > Probably that, makes more sense if it's ''rated.'' > Seriously, even if it's something I can piece together in > photoshop. I've done it before with Easy Prey and a couple poorly shot commercial vids. It's been a long time since I've watched it but I think the difference is the rated version only showed part of the pan starting from her shoulders and going to her head, where the unrated shows the complete pan of her entire body including the feet and ass. They use the same shot, just in the unrated version they start it earlier. |
Anubis |
http://www.didvids.net |
Saturday August 17 05:13:32 2013 Re: Video Mayhem [Hillside Stranglers discussion from 2004] |
Anubis wrote: I just found this comparison of the two versions. http://www.movie-censorship.com/report.php?ID=5426534 Apparently a couple of the other bondage scenes like the part where they injected a woman in windex have a few seconds more added to them, but I've never noticed the differences so they probably aren't significant enough to have stood out. |
Anubis |
http://www.anuvids.com |
Saturday August 17 07:19:44 2013 20th Century Boys |
This movie has a brief scene at the beginning. A student is shown bound and gagged while some of her classmates hijack the morning broadcast she's supposed to be delivering. |
Saturday August 17 08:33:33 2013 Re: Video Mayhem [Hillside Stranglers discussion from 2004] |
Anubis wrote: > It's been a long time since I've watched it but I think > the difference is the rated version only showed part of > the pan starting from her shoulders and going to her > head... I won't waste my time with it then. That was really the only scene in the movie I liked, the other women with scenes I didn't find very attractive and the other ones I found attractive had shitty scenes. Oh well, it was worth a shot. Thanks again. |
JDG |
Saturday August 17 22:21:36 2013 Baby Sellers |
Airs tonight at 8 PM on Lifetime, nothing in the previews showing the lead (Jennifer Finnigan) in peril but who knows what the movie might have. Did she get a scene, for anyone having seen it by now? |
|