|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Saturday December 24 00:15:43 2005 [6214] Boston Public |
| The son did not amputate the mother's hand. The mother explained that she was using a chain saw to try to cut through the handcuffs, but cut off her own hand by accident. |
| perl |
| reckonwith69@hotmail.com |
| Saturday December 24 00:21:24 2005 Re: [6214] Boston Public |
| perl wrote:
> The son did not amputate the mother's hand. Got it thanks for your assist |
| Jay L |
| Saturday December 24 19:26:04 2005 Re: [251] Phantasm II (1988) |
| Jay L wrote:
> > a tape gagged > > woman, > > There another scene then Sorry, seems I misled you there, only the scenes as described originally. I fast-forwarded the film so did not follow the plot. The scene at 23 min is the one given as at 1hr 5 min where a woman is found covered with a cloth and tape gagged. I did not recognise it as a hooded cloak and assumed she would not have survived when they flamed the thing that emerged from under the cloak behind her. I would suggest:- " Around 23 minutes in (No ads) Paula Irvine is discovered in a crypt, in a hooded cloak. The hood is pulled away from her face to reveal she is tape gagged. Lots of moaning, then something emerges from her back 'Alien' style. The gag appears to have two short strips of white hospital dressing tape material crossed over her mouth. At 1 Hour 5 minutes and at intervals during the next 10 minutes, Irvine is seen again tape gagged and strapped to a gurney being wheeled unconscious through a funeral home, where she is being taken to be cremated! Straps across chest and thighs. She revives just in time and escapes after she is placed on the conveyor into the furnace. Around 1hr and 24mins, Irvine is strapped down to the gurney again, stuff-gagged and threatened with being embalmed. Energetic struggles to free herself, and she ungags herself" |
| Joe of London |
| Saturday December 24 21:23:22 2005 Re: [251] Phantasm II (1988) |
| Joe of London wrote:
> I would suggest:- Sure thanks for your assist |
| Jay L |
|
|