|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Monday June 16 14:55:14 2008 Re: Story of Joanna listing |
| Jay L wrote: > Pat Powers wrote: > > a male/male blowjob. > > Talk about your putz scene. > > Anyway, these two things just might be important > > considerations > Okay, > but I thought putz was for male interference? I was making a play on words there. Putz is Yiddish slang for 'an annoying person' but its non-slang meaning is male genitals. Given the nature of the scene, "putz scene" seems very appropriate. > I don't figure a stand alone sex scene would cause > irritation like an interfered with scene. I figure if you don't like seeing guys in scenes, you'll be even less likely to like seeing guys having sex with other guys in scenes. True, it doesn't spoil the female bondage scenes, but it's a consideration. That's why I asked, would this be appropriate to change? (I went ahead and changed it in Database Corrections but will happily change it back if you wish. A more important consideration is Hall's butt-uglitude by modern standards. She has a long craggy face and she cries a lot in the film. Not good. |
| Pat Powers |
| Monday June 16 19:50:33 2008 Re: Story of Joanna listing |
| "I was making a play on words there. Putz is Yiddish slang for 'an annoying person' but its non-slang meaning is male genitals. Given the nature of the scene, "putz scene" seems very appropriate." Missed the humour. "I figure if you don't like seeing guys in scenes, you'll be even less likely to like seeing guys having sex with other guys in scenes. True, it doesn't spoil the female bondage scenes, but it's a consideration. That's why I asked, would this be appropriate to change?" I see "I went ahead and changed it in Database Corrections but will happily change it back if you wish." No it's fine |
| Jay L |
|
|