|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Sunday March 03 01:57:29 2002 Check to the Queen |
| aka record number 6299, describes the movie as "an Italian opus" whereas the IMDB says it's Spanish in origin, as do the names of its actors. Is this the sort of thing we need to bring to the Discussion Page, or do we defer to the IMDB here? |
| Pat Powers |
| Sunday March 03 03:02:46 2002 Re: Check to the Queen |
| > aka record number 6299, describes the movie as "an
> Italian opus" whereas the IMDB says it's Spanish in > origin, as do the names of its actors. Is this the sort > of thing we need to bring to the Discussion Page, or do > we defer to the IMDB here? Pat Powers: Figured it be easiest just to take the 'Italian' out, and let the fellas work off the title for renting. So took it out. BTW: Have you seen this? Not sure if just wearing a harness should count, unless a bit-gag huh? |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Sunday March 03 11:26:52 2002 Re: Check to the Queen |
| Haven't seen the movie, but I have a distinct memory of seeing a pic from the movie in an old (70s-80s) copy of playboy. And there is a bit gag. The pony gal in question is also topless and wearing a white leather harness. Could be from ANOTHER mainstream pony girl scene, but the only other one I know of is in Perils of Gwendoline, and they wore black leather harnesses.
|
| Pat Powers |
| Sunday March 03 12:27:30 2002 Deleted database entry |
| Hello
I've just entered the new George Michael video "Freek" into your database. There are four women on a leash, and there's nothing else bondage-wise. Now it seems the entry has been deleted. I know this is a borderline case. Perhaps this scene doesn't qualify as a bondage scene. But then,why do chloroform or handgag scenes count as bondage scenes? |
| Frank |
| Sunday March 03 13:48:19 2002 Re: Deleted database entry |
|
> Hello > > I've just entered the new George Michael video "Freek" > into your database. There are four women on a leash, and > there's nothing else bondage-wise. Now it seems the entry > has been deleted. > > I know this is a borderline case. Perhaps this scene > doesn't qualify as a bondage scene. But then,why do > chloroform or handgag scenes count as bondage scenes? ? Frank, the deleter would have to answer as to his motivation ... although I probably would've axed it as well had I come across it first. I don't know that there's a simple answer to your question. Chloro and handgags are often part of mainstream bondage scenes, and thus even when they stand alone are of interest. Faux gags have nothing to do with bondage, yet they have a place in the DB to my mind, as they mimic the reality. To me, leashes by themselves fall more into the realm of fetish imagery, rather than mainstream bondage portrayals. You're welcome to make a case for 'em, though. This shit's subjective ... the above doesn't pass muster as a rational explanation, I realize. All I can say is that the scene doesn't fit my "sense" of the DB's purpose, and I guess that's the case for whoever Xed it. |
| Biff |
|
|