|
|
This page is for posting links to online streaming video, Youtube and things like that. The rules are somewhat looser than Discussion. You can post and discuss mainstream and related amateur video. Do not post clips from commercial videos. It's usually not that hard to tell the difference.
|
|
| Thursday September 04 00:41:55 2008 Re: Doc's New Site |
| The Moderator wrote: > (unsigned poster) wrote: > > LOL - surely all these sites have the same problem, > since > > when does Brian's page get exempted from this? > What are talking about? There are no clips here. I think he means that there is discussion of clips on this site that might also violate copyright law. Of course, the entire original point is misguided, because copyright law is not criminal law. If a site is breaking copyright rules, that's his problem (assuming anyone wants to do anything about it- unlikely), and not ours for discussing it. |
| dogs. |
| Thursday September 04 02:11:10 2008 Re: One Favour CC? |
| cc wrote: > Are you out of your f*#%! mind? Rather you post alerting Brian to the "obvious age stuff" without mentioning ages, of course. He has to know to look to deal with it. Thanks |
| Jay L |
| Thursday September 04 02:35:48 2008 Girl tape gags and talks |
|
This post was deleted. Poster: (unsigned poster) Reason: This is the last warning. Any further age-inappropriate posts will result in NO MORE AMATEUR videos. |
| The Moderator |
| Thursday September 04 14:44:13 2008 Re: Doc's New Site |
| The Moderator wrote: > Abel wrote: > > doug wrote: > > If I'm not mistaken, sites like this are violating > What does mainstream have to do with it? I'm not going > to police other sites except for obvious age stuff. I believe that the poster had the belief that if a segment was broadcast it was somehow immune from copyright issues. |
| Thursday September 04 15:17:35 2008 Rainbow 'Street of Dreams' |
| Lysette Anthony B&G at beginning and throughout the video? |
 |
| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18bDYunw71o |
| Thursday September 04 18:07:16 2008 Re: Girl tape gags and talks |
| cc wrote: > Are you out of your f*#%! mind? Oh, my bad... |
| Thursday September 04 20:21:39 2008 Re: Doc's New Site |
| dogs. wrote: > The Moderator wrote: > > What are talking about? There are no clips here. > I think he means that there is discussion of clips on > this site that might also violate copyright law. Nonsense. Show me any legislation or prior cases that supports this. |
| The Moderator |
| Thursday September 04 20:22:38 2008 Re: Doc's New Site |
| (unsigned poster) wrote: > I believe that the poster had the belief that if a > segment was broadcast it was somehow immune from > copyright issues. That would be a mistaken belief. |
| The Moderator |
| Thursday September 04 22:59:36 2008 Re: Doc's New Site |
| The Moderator wrote: > dogs. wrote: > > The Moderator wrote: > > > What are talking about? There are no clips > here. > > I think he means that there is discussion of clips > on > > this site that might also violate copyright law. > Nonsense. Show me any legislation or prior cases that > supports this. Are you serious? It's just Copyright 101 that you can't copy and sell someone else's work. (There are exceptions such as fair use, but that's the rule.) It's like you asking me to list all the times the Blues have lost since 1967. Trust me. They have. Guys like Anubis have long said they would respond to legitimate requests from copyright holders to remove copyrighted material. And in his case, that's a FREE site. If someone is charging for use of the material, well, that person is obviously vunerable to a lawsuit on the issue...not that such a suit is likely. And since real life examples are lacking, I can't give you specifics of what such cases would entail. But to at least those cappers who are selling copyrighted material, they are in a potential no-no land. I don't get the "nonsense" part. |
| doggies. |
|
|