|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Saturday January 18 03:09:23 2003 Re: Biff's Post- DB |
| > I'm assuming that non-restrained items are fine to
> include as long as there is restraint mentioned elsewhere > in the entry. I'd like to keep that bottom of entry part. Felt it good for the fellas that like ladies in skirts, or with red hair, whatever? Figure saves us an argument huh? As long as they're just reporting it, and not sqwacking about anything, don't see a problem with that, or mentioning pencil gags. What do you think? |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Saturday January 18 10:57:34 2003 Re: Biff's Post- DB |
| > > I'm assuming that non-restrained items are fine to
> > include as long as there is restraint mentioned > elsewhere > > in the entry. Oh sure, the extra elements are fine, they add depth to the descriptions. > I'd like to keep that bottom of entry part. > Felt it good for the fellas that like ladies in skirts, > or with red hair, whatever? > Figure saves us an argument huh? Good. > As long as they're just reporting it, and not sqwacking > about anything, don't see a problem with that, or > mentioning pencil gags. Fine by me. As you guys are the more active editors, I'm comfortable with letting you set the bar. As I said, I am not attempting to make rulings here, just give my input as one voice among several. |
| Brian R |
| Saturday January 18 13:10:48 2003 Re: Biff's Post- DB |
| I saw the movie 'This Girl for Hire' a long time ago and there was a scene where Bess Armstrong discovers a kidnapped friend enclosed in a suit of armor.
Does this count as bondage even thought the villain didn't use the traditional ropes or chains to restrain her? |
| Ed |
| Saturday January 18 14:13:25 2003 Re: Biff's Post- DB |
| >
> Does this count as bondage even thought the villain > didn't use the traditional ropes or chains to restrain her? > I'd say that qualifies ... if the suit fits, you must acquit. |
| Biff |
| Saturday January 18 18:13:43 2003 Clarification |
| Record number: 3602
Title: Texan and Calamity Jane, The (1950) Medium: Movie Actress: Ruth Whitney Description: Dreadful western with Evelyn Ankers in the title role. Unfortunately it's Ms. Whitney playing a supporting character, who gets bound and gagged. --------------------------------------------------------- Record number: 5822 Title: Star Trek (1966) Medium: TV Series Actress: Grace Lee Whitney Description: Episode: "Miri" (1.8) Yeoman Rand (Whitney) is kidnapped by the children and tied with *very* thick rope -- you have to suspend some belief since this rope really isn't good for tying knots, but she's cute and she's in bondage. _______________________________________________________ It's the same actress. Grace Lee used the name 'Ruth' for that one movie only. |
| Saturday January 18 18:26:49 2003 Re: Clarification [#3602] |
| > Grace Lee used the name 'Ruth'
> for that one movie only. Got it, thanx for your assist here. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
|
|