|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Wednesday January 15 00:39:01 2003 Re: Party Girl |
|
> > Well, stuff like hand-gags only. > > Is that a hard and fast rule that solo handgags are > persona non grata? I've always considered them part of > the family ... second cousins, perhaps. No, that's what I mean. The rules for inclusion in the DB have tended to be somewhat loose. |
| Brian R |
| Wednesday January 15 01:37:53 2003 Re: Party Girl |
| >
> No, that's what I mean. The rules for inclusion in the > DB have tended to be somewhat loose. > Roger that. I took another look at your original post and sussed your intent. |
| Biff |
| Wednesday January 15 09:36:38 2003 Re: Perl's Entry- Offhand |
| > Just off hand, I would have pulled-reworded it as such:
I worded the entry as I did because it explains the context of the scenes. As for the other bondage, the show aired once back in 1996 so I don't remember the details. For me the main feature of the episode was the chastity belt. |
| Wednesday January 15 17:18:23 2003 Re: Brian's Post- DB |
| > > > Well, stuff like hand-gags only.
> that's what I mean. The rules for inclusion in the > DB have tended to be somewhat loose. So far, Hand gags & chloro only described as handgags have been left alone due to not being aware you considered them "weak". These are the ones have been hit, or warned against: Blindfold only: going by "bondage not fetish" comment. Food gag only: Due to sqwacking they shouldn't be in there. Arab (Burqa?): Realise appears OTM gags. "Let Hand gags in, why not this?" etc. Reasons warned off, is was hearing of Barbara Walters show (whatever?), not a TV show. So considered that "Real life". If you fellas disagree? Okay with me if you start counting them. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday January 15 17:28:28 2003 Re: Perl's Entry- Offhand |
| > As for the other bondage, the show aired once back in
> 1996 so I don't remember the details. For me the main > feature of the episode was the chastity belt. Okay, leave it here as a reference, and check into the show for ID'ing the other scenes then. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Wednesday January 15 21:12:11 2003 Re: Perl's Entry- Offhand |
|
> > feature of the episode was the chastity belt. > > Okay, > leave it here as a reference, > and check into the show for ID'ing the other scenes then. Please don't mistake that I was ruling on anything. Your opinion that the scene goes is fine. The guy asked for a reason, he's got it, that's plenty good for me. Issue closed as far as I'm concerned. There just wasn't an obvious reason like some others that you mentioned, so I couldn't answer the question directly. |
| Brian R |
|
|