|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Tuesday August 15 10:25:27 2017 [17725] Julia's Eyes aka Los ojos del Julia (2010) |
| I nominate this for deletion since there is no restraint, no faux-gags, or even a kidnapping angle. |
| Sam |
| Tuesday August 15 10:47:11 2017 Re: [17725] Julia's Eyes aka Los ojos del Julia (2010) |
| Sam wrote: > I nominate this for deletion since there is no restraint, > no faux-gags, or even a kidnapping angle. Take a look at the trailer at the link and you can see what the bandage/blindfold looks like. If you want to delete the entry after that, go ahead. |
| Gagster |
| http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1512685/videoplayer/vi371957017?ref_=tt_ov_vi |
| Tuesday August 15 12:19:37 2017 Re: [17725] Julia's Eyes aka Los ojos del Julia (2010) |
| Gagster wrote: > Take a look at the trailer at the link and you can see > what the bandage/blindfold looks like. If you want to > delete the entry after that, go ahead. Yup, as I thought. No hint of the blindfoldee being held against her will, unlike eg. dB#18567, which at least has a kidnapping/DiD aspect to it (although I wouldn't object to deleting it either, even though I created it). If something like that were allowed to stay, we'd end up including all manner of instances of where a female happily wears a sleep mask. |
| Sam |
| Tuesday August 15 13:25:09 2017 Re: [17725] Julia's Eyes aka Los ojos del Julia (2010) |
| Sam wrote: > Yup, as I thought. No hint of the blindfoldee being held > against her will, unlike eg. dB#18567, which at least has > a kidnapping/DiD aspect to it (although I wouldn't object > to deleting it either, even though I created it). > If something like that were allowed to stay, we'd end up > including all manner of instances of where a female > happily wears a sleep mask. I've got no problem with losing the Julia's Eyes entry, since it doesn't have any bondage content, but I would remind you to be judicious when evaluating whether or not entries belong in the DB. I'm constantly reminding myself that this isn't my database, its a community resource. There are all sorts of things which people include that I would never put in my own DB-cartoons, handgags, single wrist restraints, etc. etc. etc. You and I spend a lot of time looking at the database in way which most people don't - we read through it like a book when we're looking for things to improve. Most people only look at entries which pop up in response to specific queries, and the questionable entries would only come up for people that are looking for them. |
| Gagster |
| Tuesday August 15 15:22:49 2017 Re: [17725] Julia's Eyes aka Los ojos del Julia (2010) |
| Sure, and I rarely delete entries outright unless it's a duplicate, or I've messed up in my usual scatterbrained way. Plus I didn't do it unannounced. The way I came across the Julia's Eyes one was by looking for Brittany Snow scenes, and from an objective POV it simply wasn't a DiD scene by any definition over at Discussion. At least handgags or faux-gags imply some sort of restraint (cannot talk, whether voluntarily or involuntarily), as well as single-wrist restraints, but a mere blindfold is not the scope I reckon we should be encouraging. |
| Sam |
|
|