|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Wednesday April 07 00:11:43 2004 Re: Brian's Post |
| Per wrote:
> If you lose Jay you will have a problem! How about if I lose you, loudmouth? |
| Brian R |
| Wednesday April 07 00:15:15 2004 Re: Brian's Post |
| Jay wrote:
> Wasn't aware chloro by itself on topic. > Thought they out with the scarf, burqa-veil, corset and > blindfold group. What I ruled at the time was that there had to be an element of restraint involved. To my mind, that includes chloro scenes but leaves out these others. We can talk about it though, even bring it up on Discussion if need be. Were it strictly up to me, I'd weed out all handgag only scenes. But there's a decided portion of the users that are interested, so I let that ride. I wasn't trying to rag on you, I'm sure YOU know that. |
| Brian R |
| Wednesday April 07 00:16:50 2004 Re: Brian's Post |
| Raffish wrote:
> Chloro-only definitely in. Actually, blindfold-only in > as well...I thought? (Though I've never added one.) Certainly not the blindfold as in, "I have a surprise for you back at the apartment" type. Again, no element of restraint. A serious capture-oriented blindfold only we'd have to look at, I'm not sure we have one such. |
| Brian R |
| Wednesday April 07 00:19:22 2004 Re: Raffish |
| Jay wrote:
> More making sure lined up for search feature. > Said that many times Understood and appreciated. > Considering none of the Movie titles are entered that > way, and we know due to lining them all up for the > Search, correct? Absolutely. > I myself would probably have pulled it to sort it for > the search. Well, you wouldn't need to take it out to do that, would you? You just flag it for review. |
| Brian R |
| Wednesday April 07 00:28:57 2004 Re: Raffish |
| Raffish wrote:
> Slightly worried about you, Jay. I think he's trying to figure out if scalper's prices at Air-Can fit into the budget. May have to double his salary again. |
| Brian R |
| Wednesday April 07 01:44:10 2004 Re: Raffish |
| "Slightly worried about you, Jay." Not alone there Buddy but trying to reply and keep an eye on an Italian show with potential same time. "Unless purely ironic, which possible, this much omission of pronouns and verbs not healthy" Plus the "U" issue huh? understand your concern. Seriously though, I'm more concerned with the titles, as that where majority of the complaints are. Off-hand, say somebody taped a Matrix show episode that had "Fuzz all!" in it. More likely to become aware of that huh? My attitude toward the Descriptions always been if okay with you fellas, okay with me. Aware some fellas like the Blindfold-Scarf-Burqa fans figured I was picking on them, but there was an Off Topic ruling on that. Okay, back to the Important issue, catching the Jodie Dry scene roooight? Yeeah |
| Jay |
| Wednesday April 07 02:05:59 2004 Re: Brian's Post |
| "What I ruled at the time was that there had to be an
element of restraint involved. To my mind, that includes
chloro scenes" Okay, aware "but leaves out these others." That I recall "We can talk about it though, even bring it up on Discussion if need be." Were it strictly up to me, I'd weed out all handgag only scenes. But there's a decided portion of the users that are interested" I don't care about Handgags. So understand what you mean here. |
| Jay |
| Wednesday April 07 02:11:16 2004 Re: Raffish |
| Brian R wrote:
> Well, you wouldn't need to take it out to do that, > would you? You just flag it for review. Perhaps not now, with the broader search you're working on, but before, when even a space would throw it off, yes. Only when busy though. |
| Jay |
| Wednesday April 07 02:16:26 2004 Re: Raffish |
| Jay wrote:
> Brian R wrote: > > > Well, you wouldn't need to take it out to do that, > > would you? You just flag it for review. > but before, when even a space would throw it off, yes. > Only when busy though. Maybe I didn't catch what you meant by "take it out". You mean redo the title, not delete the entire post and later put it back in, right? |
| Brian R |
| Wednesday April 07 03:05:51 2004 Re: Brian- Pulling Entries |
| "You mean redo the title, not delete the entire post
and later put it back in, right?" Depends, for example, this very entry re-entered last night: The Vanishing (1993) was easily able to edit it for the search, and did. Now, If no date, and actress "Unknown" and same in this case where you have multiple films with this Title, I'll pull it right out for abit. Two things happen, either entry re-entered, this time with date, or actress, and often lined up same as others for the search. Or, I get an email about "Brian's Clique" Believe only one or two had to re-enter scant, without this working, after a Discussion Post, of course. |
| Jay |
| Wednesday April 07 03:15:53 2004 Re: Brian's Post |
| Brian R wrote:
> What I ruled at the time was that there had to be an > element of restraint involved. To my mind, that includes > chloro scenes but leaves out these others. Does that mean the entry below I made months ago should be reinstasted? I'm willing to do it to save the editors some work. I also think my entry for a great chloro scene in "Dr. Goldfoot & the Girl Bombs" was deleted and I'm not sure I ever saved my description. Do the editors have the ability to find that again? Record number: 9437 Title: Enterprise Medium: TV Series Actress: Unknown (Erin Cummings or Donna DuPlantier) Description: Episode: "Carpenter Street" (3.11) A group of Xindi travel to 21st Century Earth to create a biological weapon. They bribe a clinic worker to locate and abduct former patients with different blood types. Right after the opening credits (5-7 minutes) he lures one of them, a call girl, into his car then chloroforms her. He proceeds to carry her to a table in the makeshift Xindi lab then attach an IV and monitoring devices to her unconscious form. No restraint or gags are involved. |
| iD |
| Wednesday April 07 12:36:37 2004 Re: ID Post |
| Record number: 9437 Title: Enterprise Medium: TV Series Actress: Unknown (Erin Cummings or Donna DuPlantier) Description: Episode: "Carpenter Street" (3.11) A group of Xindi travel to 21st Century Earth to create a biological weapon. They bribe a clinic worker to locate and abduct former patients with different blood types. Right after the opening credits (5-7 minutes) he lures one of them, a call girl, into his car then chloroforms her. He proceeds to carry her to a table in the makeshift Xindi lab then attach an IV and monitoring devices to her unconscious form. No restraint or gags are involved. ___________________ This one of your's huh? That different. Recall this pulled at time we were having trouble with goof entries from our younger posters. I'll look after this, thanx |
| Jay |
| Wednesday April 07 12:48:13 2004 Re: Brian's Post |
| Brian R wrote:
> Per wrote: > > > > If you lose Jay you will have a problem! > > How about if I lose you, loudmouth? > Yeah, sorry. Guess I made my classical mistake: Having visited the Anything Goes forum, and still in a state of nervous hysteria, to go to other fora. My apologies. Won't happen again. I hope. |
| Per |
| Wednesday April 07 20:24:50 2004 Re: Brian's Post |
| Per wrote:
> My apologies. Won't happen again. I hope. You'd better do more than hope, you are on extremely thin ice. I've made the suggestion before that if you can't separate AG from other forums, STAY OFF IT. |
| Brian R |
| Wednesday April 07 20:26:14 2004 Jay |
| Sent you a couple of emails last night, today I received some notices that the messages were "delayed". I assume they got through but if not let me know.
|
| Brian R |
| Wednesday April 07 21:21:50 2004 The Princess and the Cabbie |
| Just noticed 6789, which might make a good litmus test if the blindfold debate is still underway:
Description: One scene begins with a close-up of Joanna James's (Bertinelli's) face wearing a thick scarf as a blindfold. Unfortunately, she's just playing a teaching game to help her with her dyslexia. She's not tied, but the close-ups of her gorgeous face are defintely worth a look! |
| Raffish |
| Wednesday April 07 21:57:51 2004 Re: Jay |
| Brian R wrote:
"Sent you a couple of emails last night, today I received some notices that the messages were "delayed". I assume they got through but if not let me know." ___________ Email has an upper-body injury, all authorised to say at moment. |
| Jay L |
| Wednesday April 07 22:08:03 2004 Re: The Princess and the Cabbie |
| Raffish wrote:
> Just noticed 6789 Delete the crap. Just my .2 cents. |
| Per |
|
|