|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Mon Jan 8 19:32:57 2001
Big Trouble in Little China (169) |
| As she is about to be wisked away by the demon, we can see that Ms Pai's shoes have been removed during her captivity. There is a close up of her bound stocking feet when the demon cuts the rope that ties them to the bottom of the bed. |
| Count |
| count123@sprint.ca |
| Mon Jan 8 22:52:06 2001
Re: Big Trouble in Little China (169) |
| > As she is about to be wisked away by the demon, we can > see that Ms Pai's shoes have been removed during her > captivity. There is a close up of her bound stocking feet > when the demon cuts the rope that ties them to the bottom > of the bed. Got it. |
| David |
| Mon Jan 8 23:28:54 2001
Re: Recent additions to database |
| > It's seems that the source of the entries is the slave > labor compilation tapes, but it's hard to tell if the > person has actually seen the tapes or is just plugging in > the info. About six months ago, I announced on the Discussion page that I planned to add all the scenes not in the database which were listed in the compilation tapes table of contents (ToC). Many of the scenes mentioned I have not seen, which accounts for the vague "bound and gagged" scattered throughout the database. I entered over 500 scenes based on the slavelabor tapes. > Many of the entries do not specify anything about the > scene, just the name of the actress, the title of the > program and a warning about "buyer/renter beware." While > we all want as complete a database as possible, if anyone > can fill in the details on some of these scenes, it would > be much appreciated. Of the scenes mentioned in the ToC which I have seen, 99% of them were "bound and gagged" and most of those that weren't were helpfully labeled "NG" by whoever put the tapes on their website. I rashly assumed that I could count on the tapes being the work of a gagsnob and those scenes of ungagged damsels would be noted. Over the past several weeks, several folks taped or rented movies based on my blithe "bound and gagged" description and were miffed that the information I placed in the database was in error and the damsels were not in fact gagged. Therefore, for the database entries I tossed in from the latest five slavelabor tapes I added "the buyer/taper beware" warning. I thought I was being helpful when I turned out to be merely cryptic. > Two errors I can see: #3890, Bad CATS, should be Michelle > Pfeiffer, not Michelle Johnson (sorry Mr. Moderator and > editors, I forgot to look up the earlier Bad CATS entry). The table of contents said Michelle Phillips, not Pfeiffer, hence the entry on #3890. I'll correct that. > Also, I bought what I believe is one of the tapes > referred to (not from slave labor, but from Brent Smith) > and maybe I'm wrong but I don't think #3900 (Priscilla > Barnes in American Girls) exists. On the tape I have the > scene is database entry #1866--Barnes bound and gagged in > a car. The slavelabor ToC for tape #32 specifically mentions two different scenes, one of which took place on a boat. (Actually, it said the bondagette on the boat was Priscilla Barnes Chase, but I couldn't find a Priscilla Chase in IMDB, so I assumed it was a typo). > Again, thanks to the person who has gone to all the work > of putting these entries in, but I think we have a few > (soap opera) duplications. I've taken pains to avoid duplications; for example, I never put in muliple scenes for the same actress from the same soap unless there was some sort of difference noted in the table of contents. For example, tape 33 mentions Days of Our Lives' Deidre Hall being in peril in 1) a mirror, 2) a car and 3) a boat and General Hospital's Emma Samms getting it on a train and in a Health Club. However, there's always the potential for a brain cramp or a mix-up. If anyone wants to put up the $1800 to purchase the entire set for me, I'll be happy to update the database based on my research.... |
| David |
| Mon Jan 8 23:33:35 2001
Re: Recent Entries |
| > The earlier Bad CATS entry is #33. Okay, I see -- the Bad CATS entries are apparently duplicates. #3890 is toast. |
| David |
|
|