|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
Sun Jan 7 13:37:43 2001
Entries |
As posted on Discussion:<br><br> I've seen a number of recent one similar to:<br><br> <i>Description: Listed in the table of contents for http://www.slavelaborproductions.com Tape 36 ("Soaps & Ropes 5"). Most of the scenes on these videos are of the 'bound and gagged' variety, but let the renter/taper beware. </i><br><br> I'd prefer that other sites not be listed, since no one knows whether the information will still be current in the future. Something a bit more general, such as "an index for a scene tape" or even "Brent Smith's tape indexes" would be more appropriate. <br><br> Ones in question are recent entries 3724 through 3923. <br><br> I'll fix up some of them shortly. <br><br> |
Brian R |
Sun Jan 7 13:48:38 2001
Recent additions to database |
Someone has gone to a great deal of trouble the last few days and added a ton of entries to the database, but there are a few problems. It's seems that the source of the entries is the slave labor compilation tapes, but it's hard to tell if the person has actually seen the tapes or is just plugging in the info. Many of the entries do not specify anything about the scene, just the name of the actress, the title of the program and a warning about "buyer/renter beware." While we all want as complete a database as possible, if anyone can fill in the details on some of these scenes, it would be much appreciated. (I think some of the soap opera scenes are duplicates). Two errors I can see: #3890, Bad CATS, should be Michelle Pfeiffer, not Michelle Johnson (sorry Mr. Moderator and editors, I forgot to look up the earlier Bad CATS entry). Also, I bought what I believe is one of the tapes referred to (not from slave labor, but from Brent Smith) and maybe I'm wrong but I don't think #3900 (Priscilla Barnes in American Girls) exists. On the tape I have the scene is database entry #1866--Barnes bound and gagged in a car. Again, thanks to the person who has gone to all the work of putting these entries in, but I think we have a few duplications. Final note: It would be nice if, on the anything goes page, the person who made these entries could clarify the "buyer/renter beware" statement. As someone who is trying to track these scenes down, and has some money, but not a lot, to buy some of these tapes, it would be much appreciated to know what he means and which tapes are the best. |
Soul Boy |
Sun Jan 7 13:54:18 2001
Recent Entries |
Looks like we were entering a message about the same topic at the same time, Mr. Moderator...only you're a faster typist. The earlier Bad CATS entry is #33. Also, when I did the search on Pfeiffer, I noticed there is a listing for the movie Wolf twice, #'s 3329 and 3577. |
Soul Boy |
Sun Jan 7 14:01:07 2001
Entries |
As posted on Discussion: I've seen a number of recent one similar to: Description: Listed in the table of contents for http://www.slavelaborproductions.com Tape 36 ("Soaps & Ropes 5"). Most of the scenes on these videos are of the 'bound and gagged' variety, but let the renter/taper beware. I'd prefer that other sites not be listed, since no one knows whether the information will still be current in the future. Something a bit more general, such as "an index for a scene tape" or even "Brent Smith's tape indexes" would be more appropriate. Ones in question are recent entries somewhere in the 3724 to 3923 range. I'll fix up some of them shortly. |
Brian R |
Sun Jan 7 14:09:10 2001
Re: Recent additions to database |
> It's seems that the source of the entries is the slave > labor compilation tapes, but it's hard to tell if the > person has actually seen the tapes or is just plugging in > the info. I get the feeling that's the case. > Many of the entries do not specify anything about the > scene, just the name of the actress, the title of the > program and a warning about "buyer/renter beware." While > we all want as complete a database as possible, if anyone > can fill in the details on some of these scenes, it would > be much appreciated. (I think some of the soap opera > scenes are duplicates). Yeah, besides the link problem I mentioned above, all these entries need to be cross-checked to make sure they aren't duplicates. > Final note: It would be nice if, on the anything goes > page, the person who made these entries could clarify the > "buyer/renter beware" statement. As someone who is trying > to track these scenes down, and has some money, but not a > lot, to buy some of these tapes, it would be much > appreciated to know what he means and which tapes are the > best. I think it just means there was no further information on the lists, and the poster isn't familiar with the scenes. Which is a problem. |
Brian R |
Sun Jan 7 14:16:59 2001
Re: Entries |
> Ones in question are recent entries somewhere in the 3724 > to 3923 range. > > I'll fix up some of them shortly. I did all the ones before 3889. |
Brian R |
|