|
This page is for posting links to online streaming video, Youtube and things like that. The rules are somewhat looser than Discussion. You can post and discuss mainstream and related amateur video. Do not post clips from commercial videos. It's usually not that hard to tell the difference.
|
|
Tuesday February 16 04:38:46 2016 Dumb but cute |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diphb0kUa30 |
DHT |
omac4w@yahoo.com |
Tuesday February 16 05:06:46 2016 Re: Not Going Out |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > Christmas special aired a few months ago, any vids? Sure, here's one. I decided to cut the whole "fake labor" ruse after the gags come off, which goes on for several minutes longer but is pretty visually static, plus all those putzes. (Shame that Sally Bretton here is the only damsel of whom we ever get a solo shot.) |
Raffish |
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4u3brXcKItMcnhEeEhTVHB0TTA |
Tuesday February 16 06:58:40 2016 Vanity: In memoriam |
From Discussion. The Last Dragon (1985) Featuring Vanity Also, here's a direct link to Major John's clip of her short gag scene in Miami Vice S03E20 "By Hooker By Crook" (unhappy ending): https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4u3brXcKItMeWNnYkQ3MXV4dGs |
Raffish |
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4u3brXcKItMNEFSTU9RVDlXRzA |
Tuesday February 16 07:00:29 2016 Re: Not Going Out |
Raffish wrote: >(Shame that Sally Bretton here is > the only damsel of whom we ever get a solo shot.) You can always use edit magic and blur the putz away, mmmphing however is still a challenge to edit. |
Avi |
Tuesday February 16 07:08:53 2016 Re: Not Going Out |
Avi wrote: > Raffish wrote: > >(Shame that Sally Bretton here is > > the only damsel of whom we ever get a solo shot.) > You can always use edit magic and blur the putz away, > mmmphing however is still a challenge to edit. Also, I'm so happy they used the "ran out of tape" joke on him and not her. |
Avi |
Tuesday February 16 08:33:08 2016 Re: Not Going Out |
Avi wrote: > You can always use edit magic and blur the putz away, > mmmphing however is still a challenge to edit. Just as a personal preference, I'd rather not blur. I *am* still waiting for the perfect putz scene to try some shot-by-shot cropping and zooming, but this didn't seem to be it. There were relatively few shots where it seemed like it might be effective, such as the rare two-shot with a single back-to-back couple -- and even then, the guy takes up so much of the frame that keeping just the damsel (while preserving the aspect ratio) would require a really jarring amount of zooming. One idea I had would be to "pan and scan" the entire clip to, say, 4:3 first, which would allow for less zooming on the shots that could benefit. It would be interesting to try, but I still don't think this is the right clip for it, because there just aren't enough of those shots. |
Raffish |
Tuesday February 16 11:05:25 2016 Re: Not Going Out |
Raffish wrote: > One idea I had would be to "pan and scan" the > entire clip to, say, 4:3 first, which would allow for > less zooming on the shots that could benefit. Since a picture is worth a thousand words and all... Though notice how, in this scene, even the "better" version has to leave out the tape around her torso, which we'd tend to consider an important part of the shot -- even when the frame starts out panned as far to the right as possible. |
Raffish |
Tuesday February 16 12:25:05 2016 Re: Second Chance |
Sander wrote: > >Is that Taylor Cole? > Yeah, she tweeted about it! ;) I'm really starting to become a fan of hers. No real great scenes, but she doesn't seem to mind them |
Tuesday February 16 13:09:37 2016 Re: Second Chance |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > Sander wrote: > > >Is that Taylor Cole? > > Yeah, she tweeted about it! ;) > I'm really starting to become a fan of hers. No real > great scenes, but she doesn't seem to mind them Not to mention she had Sarah Rohm tightly tied and tape gagged in The Event, where she herself was later B&G. |
Tuesday February 16 13:13:15 2016 Re: Second Chance |
(unsigned poster) wrote: > > > great scenes, but she doesn't seem to mind them > Not to mention she had Sarah Rohm Sarah Roemer meant to say. |
Tuesday February 16 13:45:44 2016 Amorcito Corazon E204-E205 |
Here's a 360p edit of that nice Mexican scene from Discussion. Thanks to Rony and Guest123 for the tip! Featuring Elizabeth Álvarez and África Zavala. |
Raffish |
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4u3brXcKItMdVRsd3o0Z3pxMHM |
Tuesday February 16 14:12:53 2016 Re: Kidnapped Girls Agency (Linnea Quigley) |
Quigley had a great scene in Deadly Embrace. Kind of highlighted at her Twitter page |
https://twitter.com/LinneaQuigley |
Tuesday February 16 15:37:40 2016 More Deadpool |
As expected, the cam copies keep getting better. Silversurferster found this one, and I did my best to remove the keystoning. He's actually been making two clips from each cam, the second of which is the non-gag scene with Morena in the glass case. They're all in the archive under _New Files, for anyone who wants to compare. |
Raffish |
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4u3brXcKItMUXY0T3NDSTk0b28 |
Tuesday February 16 17:33:57 2016 Aktenzeichen XY ungelöst - March 3, 1995 |
Sam's already clipped the first DiD storyline from this episode, but I've never seen a fully-edited clip of the second...and I'm pretty impressed with that hogtie, even without a gag. |
Raffish |
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4u3brXcKItMRVJIX0VkeWVQczA |
Tuesday February 16 17:35:20 2016 Re: Kidnapped Girls Agency (Linnea Quigley) |
I liked her scene with Ginger Lynn Allen in Vice Academy 2. Too bad there were no gags for those two in that series of pictures. |
Snowcat |
|