|
|
Welcome to the Database Correction page. This page is for letting me or the other editors know of corrections that need to be made. Please read the posting instructions carefully.
|
|
| Friday October 12 00:02:53 2001 Re: Question regarding #5715 |
| > David,
> > This scene was discussed in some detail about a year ago > and around that time the entry was correct. Now, however, > the description of the bondage is completely wrong.The > plot is still accurate but Montgomery is never shown tied > to a chair.Her scene took place in the back of a > semi-trailer and she is shown briefly OTM gagged with > black cloth, hands tied behind her back while standing > amid a pile of boxes. > How does this type of error occur? I can see a record > being wrong initially and then corrected but how does a > re-write like 5715 get validated? > I can't remember for sure all of those involved in the > original discussion but I'm pretty sure CM can vouch for > my memory of this scene. > How do you resolve this type of correction? There are > now two very different versions of her scene on the table. Falcon: Changed it to your description. Thanx |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Friday October 12 00:20:31 2001 Re: Falcon's Post, Entry #5715 |
| Falcon:
I'll try to answer some of your questions here. (Possibly?) David does do the Lion's share of looking after the DB, but one of us others may be responsible here. ****This scene was discussed in some detail about a year ago and around that time the entry was correct. Now, however, the description of the bondage is completely wrong.***** ****How does this type of error occur?***** Figure it could have been a situation where a poster to this page erred to the actress/episode. Admit, In my case, probably would have taken their word for it. (Same as I took your's tonight). Take David and us forever if we had to wait and view the scenes ourselves, hence have to rely on info here. *****How do you resolve this type of correction?***** Mean if Buddy who posted the other description got on me to change it back? Figure I'd post to Discussion, see what the DiDcap/Experts (Like CM) had to say. Be a bugger though! ****There are now two very different versions of her scene on the table.***** Searched under both 'Riptide' & 'Belinda': Only your entry/description is in for both. Thanx again for your assistance here. |
| Jay L |
| kdnpr@yahoo.com |
| Friday October 12 04:23:50 2001 The Raven |
| The actress is handgagged twice, both times by Jack Nicholson: once on a wild stage-coach ride in the first half-hour, and then again in a friendly grab in her mansion room somewhere in the middle. |
| On The Prowl |
| Friday October 12 10:43:18 2001 Re: Question regarding #5715 |
| > David,
> >..... How does this type of error occur? I can see a record being wrong initially and then corrected but how does a re-write like 5715 get validated? > I can't remember for sure all of those involved in the > original discussion but I'm pretty sure CM can vouch for > my memory of this scene. > How do you resolve this type of correction? There are > now two very different versions of her scene on the table. Falcon: I agree with Jay's answer. When I haven't seen a scene, as is frequently the case, I assume whoever submits the correction knows what they're talking about. I, for one, can't remember what I ate for breakfast yesterday, so I could very well have updated this entry several times and forgot about preceding corrections. Of course, another editor could have changed the entry without ever posting it on the corrections page. If you notice the scene description being changed again, let us know and we'll post the discrepancy on the Discussion Page for, hopefully, final resolution. For now, we'll leave the entry updated per your submission |
| David |
| Friday October 12 11:14:38 2001 Re: The Raven |
| > The actress is handgagged twice, both times by Jack
> Nicholson: once on a wild stage-coach ride in the first > half-hour, and then again in a friendly grab in her > mansion room somewhere in the middle. Got it, thanks! It would help if you included the Database entry #. Saves your lazy editors a couple of steps. |
| David |
| Friday October 12 20:08:20 2001 Re: Question regarding #5715 |
|
> I agree with Jay's answer. When I haven't seen a scene, > as is frequently the case, I assume whoever submits the > correction knows what they're talking about. I, for one, > can't remember what I ate for breakfast yesterday, so I > could very well have updated this entry several times and > forgot about preceding corrections. Also, even though the other guys usually get to them before I do, I review every post on this page. I squawk if any "correction" doesn't look right to me. |
| Brian R |
| Friday October 12 22:51:09 2001 Re: Question regarding #5715 |
| > If you notice the scene description being changed again,
> let us know and we'll post the discrepancy on the > Discussion Page for, hopefully, final resolution. For > now, we'll leave the entry updated per your submission David, I will be sure to. As always, thanks for your efforts and I'm very glad to see that Jay L is editing as well. |
| Falcon |
|
|